Search for: "In re S. W. (1978)"
Results 261 - 269
of 269
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Apr 2011, 8:03 am
’s Mot.; Def. [read post]
9 Jul 2012, 1:11 pm
Diehr, 450 U.S. 188, 198-90 (1981) (citing In re Bergy, 596 F.2d 952, 961 (CCPA 1979)). [read post]
23 Sep 2021, 1:09 pm
Aug. 12, 2021) (quoting In re Murchison, 349 U.S. 133, 136 (1955)). [read post]
27 Jun 2023, 9:01 pm
”[38] As then-Commissioner Paul Atkins once said, “[W]e must be vigilant that the shareholder proposal process does not result in the tyranny of the minority. [read post]
17 Jul 2023, 8:32 am
Only approximately 3% of Abitron’s overall global sales were direct sales to US customers. [read post]
22 Sep 2010, 1:11 pm
While many consider these general principles to be a secondary source of international law that “may be invoked as supplementary rules… where appropriate” (14), some consider them on an “footing of formal equality with the two positivist elements of custom and treaty”. (15) Examples are the principles of res judicata, equity, justice, and estoppel. [read post]
17 Mar 2022, 10:34 am
The explanation for the broader trend of manufacturing’s employment since the 1970s also helps account for a recent bounce-back in manufacturing employment since 2010. [read post]
11 Sep 2009, 6:31 pm
Fibre Works, Inc., 575 F.2d 1152, 1157 (6th Cir. 1978) (Markey, J.). [read post]
12 Oct 2015, 3:25 pm
The court in Schrems v Data Protection Commissioner [2014] IEHC 310 (18 June 2014), questioned whether the Directive and the EU Commissioner’s Decision needed to be re-evaluated in the light of the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights and whether the Commissioner could look beyond or otherwise disregard the Community finding. [read post]
