Search for: "In the Interest of: R.C."
Results 261 - 280
of 395
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Jun 2020, 8:29 am
The court held that the orders couldn't be upheld under "strict scrutiny," i.e., as "the least restrictive means to achieve a compelling state interest": Assuming, without deciding, that there is a compelling state interest in protecting civil-stalking victims from fear of imminent physical harm or mental distress, the means chosen here are not the least restrictive. [read post]
12 Aug 2019, 7:52 am
R.C. 2950.99 (Penalty provisions for sexually oriented offenses.) [read post]
25 Sep 2014, 10:21 am
The Challenged Statutes R.C. 2152.10(A)(2)(b) (Transfer is mandatory for offenses by juveniles involving a firearm) R.C. 2152.12(A)(1)(b) (Transfer is mandatory for certain offenses if the child is sixteen or seventeen at the time of the act charged.) [read post]
7 Feb 2014, 2:49 pm
I would further conclude that R.C. 2923.16(B) is narrowly tailored to serve a significant government interest, and that it adequately leaves open alternative means for an individual to assert his or her Second Amendment right to bear arms. [read post]
19 Sep 2023, 2:00 am
Under R.C. [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 3:50 am
Singleton, remanded the case for a sentencing hearing “for the limited purpose of the proper imposition of postrelease control pursuant to R.C. 2929.191. [read post]
23 Sep 2019, 7:18 am
Rieger filed a motion arguing that R.C. 2315.21, the Ohio statute capping punitive damages at twice the compensatory damages, was unconstitutional. [read post]
25 Oct 2016, 8:56 am
I find it interesting that Ohio has not joined the 14 states that invalidate a juvenile’s waiver without additional safeguards such as the presence of a parent during questioning, and wonder if the Ohio high court will take this case in on that issue. [read post]
18 Mar 2019, 9:04 am
These interests are furthered by barring evidence of the victim’s prior sexual abuse. [read post]
2 Mar 2020, 4:58 am
The fact that Bozso is a refugee also shows that he had a significant interest in avoiding any deportation proceedings: a refugee is a person who has no nationality and is unable or unwilling to return to [read post]
14 Jan 2020, 7:19 am
At issue in this case is whether a trial court’s denial of an appointed attorney’s motion to withdraw due to a conflict of interest is a final appealable order under R.C. 2505.02(B)(4) and, if so, whether the motion was properly denied in this case. [read post]
18 Mar 2015, 8:24 am
R.C. 2950 (creates registration and notification requirements for sexual predators, habitual sex offenders and sexually oriented offenders.) [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 2:37 pm
”16 The Court continued on to state that R.C. 163.14 requires the jury to assess the damages to rest due “without deductions for general benefits to an owner’s property. [read post]
20 May 2019, 4:57 am
Just because the trial court gives the advisements under R.C. 2943.031(A) does not cure a lawyer’s failure to advise his client of the immigration consequences of a guilty plea. [read post]
19 Feb 2014, 6:17 am
(Insurer’s tortious litigation conduct imputed to its insured for purposes of prejudgment interest award to plaintiff.) [read post]
30 Nov 2011, 3:28 am
And that judge also has some interesting things to say about the state of allied offense law since State v. [read post]
1 Jan 2020, 9:35 am
The Court held that under its existing precedent, the test in a name change case is the best interest of the child, which in this case was to keep the mother’s name. [read post]
22 May 2023, 11:40 am
Following is a non-inclusive listing of public infrastructure improvements described in R.C. 5709.40. [read post]
30 Jul 2009, 2:16 pm
However, the Court in Maggiore found that R.C. 5321.17 applies only to residential leases. [read post]
31 Aug 2009, 2:43 pm
" There are two particularly interesting aspects to the Allen case. [read post]
