Search for: "In the Matter of: FITNESS HOLDINGS INTERNATIONAL, INC."
Results 261 - 280
of 371
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Nov 2010, 3:48 pm
See, e.g., DIRECTV, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Aug 2022, 5:01 am
Boston Symphony Orchestra, Inc., 855 F.2d 888, 894, [read post]
13 Jan 2022, 1:16 pm
See BST Holdings, L.L.C. v. [read post]
11 Nov 2014, 7:27 pm
Forest City Enterprises, Inc.,[2] 426 U.S. 668 (1976) (due process limitations)· K.K. [read post]
4 Jun 2020, 7:30 am
It’s PayPal Holdings Inc. [read post]
19 Jun 2023, 5:26 am
International legal framework The International legal framework consists of three major international conventions. [read post]
13 Nov 2011, 7:57 pm
" In holding so, the court did not do what was it charged to decide - to determine whether the Red Sole Mark identifies and distinguishes Louboutin as the source - but instead carved out a one-shoe-fits all exception that a single color for fashion items is never subject to protection. [read post]
29 Dec 2014, 5:25 pm
” We need to ask further: “why do we believe “personal control” matters? [read post]
12 Nov 2009, 7:20 am
The recommendation of a two-year holding period came not only from the corporate community, but also from the Committee on Investment of Employee Benefit Assets and from a number of labor unions and public employee pension funds (American Federation of Labor and Congress of Industrial Organizations, Central Pension Fund, International Association of Machinists and Aerospace Workers, International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Laborers’ International… [read post]
16 Jul 2013, 8:55 am
EXEMPTIONS Golden Gate Land Holding, LLC v. [read post]
28 Aug 2015, 9:36 am
”) (internal citations and quotation marks omitted). [read post]
9 Jul 2010, 6:12 am
Subject Matter, 35 U.S.C. [read post]
23 Feb 2010, 6:16 am
As a result of changes to NYSE Rule 452 (the “broker vote rule”) that took effect January 1, brokers that do not receive specific voting instructions from customers that hold shares in “street name” will not be able to vote those shares in director elections at a company’s annual meeting. [read post]
3 May 2007, 10:20 am
The "exercise of judicial power to establish the new liability. . .would be intruding within a field properly within Congress' control and as to a matter concerning which it has seen fit to take no action. [read post]
18 Jul 2008, 8:34 am
: (Patent Circle), Tanzania to conduct study on impact of counterfeit medicines: (Afro-IP), US: New rules on generic biological medicines under US Congressional debate: (Intellectual Property Watch), Pharma & Biotech - Products Acular (Ketorolac) – US: CAFC rules against Apotex reverse doctrine of equivalents: Roche Palo Alto & Allergan, Inc v Apotex: (Patent Circle), Carbatrol (Carbamazapine) – US: Federal judge allows Corepharma to seek DJ that its… [read post]
13 Feb 2024, 9:05 pm
To be sure, these changes can matter, but they are not the kinds of rules most people have in mind when they are assessing rulemaking activity of an agency. [read post]
8 Jun 2010, 6:10 am
Solutions, Inc., 365 F.3d 353, 372 (5th Cir. 2004). [read post]
22 Jul 2011, 10:06 am
The Court in the said case observed that having regards to the facts and circumstances of the case, this is not a fit case to be entertained to exercise jurisdiction under Article 32 of the Constitution. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 12:20 pm
Those who know Fish say he doesn’t look for the last buck or hold out for the last penny in a deal. [read post]
1 Feb 2008, 12:00 am
, (Intellectual Property Watch), (Out-Law), (Electronic Frontier Foundation), The UK High Court allows computer program patent claims in Astron Clinica & Ors v The Comptroller: (IPKat), (BLOG@IP::JUR), (Filemot), (IAM), (The IP Factor), (IP Updates), (IMPACT), (IPcentral Weblog), (Out-Law), (IPBiz),Tarceva (Erlotinib) - Roche patent infringement action against CIPLA before Delhi High Court: Many posts at: (Spicy IP) and… [read post]
