Search for: "In the Matter of the Parenting and Support of: G."
Results 261 - 280
of 709
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Nov 2017, 2:04 pm
A fee of $100.00 shall be payable to the Alcohol Education, Rehabilitation and Enforcement Fund established pursuant to section 3 of P.L. 1983, c.531 (C. 26: 2B-32) to support the Intoxicated Driving Program Unit. [read post]
6 Nov 2017, 1:44 pm
Separate Property of Each PartyThe parties wish to identify what will remain the separate property of each party during the domestic partnership, and to determine their rights in the event of a separation or dissolution of their domestic partnership, as hereinafter discussed.The following shall constitute and remain the “separate property” of the respective parties: (a) property, whether real or personal, and whether vested, contingent, or inchoate, belonging to or acquired by a party… [read post]
30 Oct 2017, 5:31 am
For the examining divisions assigned for a divisional and its parent application, no provisions exist which limit overlaps between the examining divisions. [read post]
11 Oct 2017, 9:22 am
States have an obligation to ensure that projects supported by international financial mechanisms respect, protect and fulfil human rights relating to the enjoyment of a safe, clean, healthy and sustainable environment. [read post]
10 Oct 2017, 2:58 am
Hill, Jr.v.Shamoun & Norman, LLP ---------------------------------------------------------On Petition for ReviewFrom the Fifth Court of Appeals, Dallas, Texas (No. 05-13-01634-CV)---------------------------------------------------------AMICUS CURIAE BRIEF SUBMITTED IN SUPPORT OF PETITIONER ALBERT G. [read post]
10 Sep 2017, 3:07 pm
To survive a motion to dismiss, the complaint "must contain sufficient factual matter to state a claim to relief that is plausible on its face. [read post]
7 Sep 2017, 6:00 pm
Charles divorce lawyer Matthew G. [read post]
3 Aug 2017, 12:13 pm
At the same time, she contradicted her own precept that South Carolina courts should stay out of Episcopal Church matters and defer to its "ecclesiastical determinations. [read post]
28 Jul 2017, 12:34 pm
The state’s brief opposing the challengers’ motion, and supporting its motion for summary judgment. [read post]
21 Jul 2017, 8:02 am
However, that is not the case here.6.3 The appellant's interpretation is furthermore not supported by the explanatory remarks to the amendment of Rule 36(2) EPC which entered into force in 2010(CA/145/08, page 8). [read post]
10 Jul 2017, 11:46 pm
The subject-matter of claim 1 and dependent claim 2 was the same as the subject-matter of independent claim 23 and dependent claim 24 of the parent application as originally filed.b) In the European Search Opinion based on the application as originally filed it was held that- neither the subject-matter of independent claim 3 and dependent claims 6 to 8, nor the description of the application were in conformity with Article 76(1) EPC, and- the… [read post]
9 Jul 2017, 8:21 pm
Children are to be treated the same, no matter who their parents are and no matter what the legal status of their parents’ relationship. [33] The continuation of that distinction here for an ill or disabled child of unmarried parents is difficult to justify in the modern era of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms. [read post]
3 Jul 2017, 6:38 am
Alito Jr. concurring joined by Chief Justice John G. [read post]
2 Jul 2017, 9:01 pm
Annette G. [read post]
2 Jul 2017, 9:01 pm
Annette G. [read post]
26 Jun 2017, 10:33 am
”) Justice Stephen G. [read post]
23 Jun 2017, 4:25 am
In The Washington Post, Robert Barnes reports that “Justice Stephen G. [read post]
22 Jun 2017, 6:35 am
The author supports this finding and suggests that it should also be applied to the distinction between the Rome I Regulation and the Rome II Regulation. [read post]
21 Jun 2017, 7:59 am
§ 922(g)(1), based on their as-applied Second Amendment claim that their criminal offenses and other particular circumstances do not warrant a firearms disqualification. [read post]
8 Jun 2017, 2:46 pm
Albright, 261 F.3d 127 (2nd Cir. 2001), aff’g 2000 WL 1154310 (S.D.N.Y. 2001). [read post]
