Search for: "Ip v. C. I. R" Results 261 - 280 of 495
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Aug 2018, 3:12 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Not well described in the IP context w/r/t these norms. [read post]
29 Jan 2021, 7:20 am by Nicolas Round (Bristows)
  Four bases are identified during the sequencing process (assigned the letters C, G, A or T) and it is the order of these letters which gives the DNA sequence. [read post]
19 Oct 2011, 5:39 am by Gilles Cuniberti
On October 18th, 2011, the Grand Chamber of the European Court of Justice held in Realchemie Nederland BV v Bayer CropScience AG (Case C 406/09) that the Brussels I Regulation applies to fines ordered to ensure compliance with jugdments given in civil and commercial matters. [read post]
22 Apr 2009, 7:12 am
______________________________________________________________ I N D I C E I.- La función de los signos distintivos y el concepto de marca a.- La función de los signos distintivos b.- El concepto y la funcionalidad de las marcas II.- Diferentes aspectos de los nombres de dominio a) Aspectos informáticos de los nombres de dominio. [read post]
13 Jun 2014, 2:58 am
 There are notoriously known marks (6bis Paris Convention) but these fall under 8(2)(c) CTMR, not under 8(4). [read post]
14 Mar 2022, 10:37 pm by Florian Mueller
The "Defending American Courts Act" is by far and away the lowest-quality piece of work I've ever seen from U.S. lawmakers in an IP context. [read post]
26 Sep 2015, 9:16 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  Rules v. standards: vague(r) claim language helps or could help block mere design-arounds. [read post]
1 Sep 2019, 3:15 am by Barry Sookman
IP Rights – JD Supra https://t.co/CCFNmHuQuO 2019-08-25 IEEE Ethically Aligned Design https://t.co/l99drZqdJ2 2019-08-25 Time to kill s230: A Significant Section 230 Defense Win in the Ninth Circuit–Dyroff v. [read post]
30 Apr 2019, 7:22 am
   The German (Düsseldorf) and Dutch courts found the opposite and concluded that Article 3(c) was not met. [read post]
19 Dec 2012, 3:23 am by Dennis Crouch
File Attachment: NY IP Law Ass'n--ISO Neither Party.pdf (735 KB) Efforts in some decisions to dissect the claim into old and new parts or computer and non-computer elements, should be rejected as squarely inconsistent with the Supreme Court's holdings in Diamond v. [read post]
3 Aug 2023, 3:11 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
[Chris Buccafusco and I have a paper in progress about this.] [read post]