Search for: "J. DOe" Results 261 - 280 of 28,527
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 May 2007, 7:21 am
Among the Court of Appeals decisions denied transfer last week was the 10/31/06 ruling in Flying J., Inc. v. [read post]
21 Aug 2012, 5:01 pm by oliver
Rather, the declarations and the electronically filed instructions of 23 December 2008, if read together, suggest, if anything, that CPA was going to pay the third renewal fee and surcharge.[7] Thus the Board concludes that the [applicant’s] request for re-establishment of 23 December 2008 does not contain an instruction, explicit or implicit, that the EPO should deduct the third renewal fee and surcharge from the European representative’s account.[8] Turning now to the… [read post]
27 Nov 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
As explained above, to appreciate this, one does not need to have any notion of what a tandem-type colour image forming apparatus might be or to understand what the [read post]
10 Apr 2018, 1:42 am by Sander van Rijnswou
 The applicant does not agree, and wants the receiving section to decide that the figures were present. [read post]
10 Apr 2018, 1:42 am by Sander van Rijnswou
 The applicant does not agree, and wants the receiving section to decide that the figures were present. [read post]
12 Oct 2010, 6:44 pm by jefhenninger
  Thus, if Ritacco does get indicted, there is a good chance that the case could go to trial. [read post]
Sending in a question by email or any other means does not create an attorney-client relationship. * This is an advertisement. [read post]
8 Nov 2010, 3:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
In general, a mistake or ignorance of the law is an insufficient ground for re-establishment: see J 5/94 [3.1], J 27/01 [3.3.1], J 2/02 [8] and J 6/07 [2.4-5]. [read post]