Search for: "J. G." Results 261 - 280 of 8,280
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Jan 2020, 12:01 pm by Mathew Reisig
Get the best possible outcome in your 2C:39-10(g) case by calling Matt Reisig today at 732-385-3339 to talk an experienced New Jersey gun charges attorney for free. [read post]
17 Jun 2022, 6:53 am by Guest Author
As Professor Richard Pierce explains, Section 6(g) is at best ambiguous, and could also be read to authorize only procedural rules, statements of policy, and interpretative rules. [read post]
2 Apr 2023, 10:41 am by David Adelstein
A new insurance coverage opinion dealing with a commercial general liability’s (CGL) duty to defend involved exclusions commonly known as the (j)(6) and (j)(7) property damage exclusions (and in certain policies known as the (j)(5) and (j)(6) exclusions). [read post]
20 Aug 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
G 3/92 [1]).[3.1.10] As the Board has decided in its decision J 33/03 [2.1], contrary to the decision to stay the proceedings according to Rule 14(1), it is in the discretion of the Office to decide whether the proceedings are to be continued under R 14(3). [read post]
10 Oct 2006, 2:02 pm
., G. and An Bord Uchtala[2006] IEHC 278High Court, MacMenamin J., 15 September 2006A reminder of news coverage:Landmark ruling gives custody to adopters[www.ireland.com]High Court turns down adoption application[www.rte.ie]Couple lose daughter in tug-of-love ruling[www.unison.ie] [read post]
30 Jul 2007, 3:09 am
This from my oldest son, whom many of you know, formerly a technology employee with the law firms of J&G, Locke Liddell.Ms. [read post]
11 Jul 2011, 3:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
” The other decisions cited by the [applicant] do not deal with the procedural situation after grant of the European patent and its publication and are, therefore, not appropriate to answer the question as to the pendency of an application in the present case. [6] The cited decisions J 7/04 and G 1/09 are based on the wording of former A 97(4) EPC 1973 (now A 97(3)). [read post]
7 Feb 2010, 3:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
As regards the time limit for the payment of the renewal fees for a European patent application under A 86, the EPO is under no obligation to remind the applicant of its expiration and the applicant can derive no right from the absence of any such reminder (established jurisprudence following J 12/84; J 1/89). [7] The appellant also submitted that if a further prosecution of the application is refused based on non-payment of the renewal fee, it would defeat the purpose of R 108(3).… [read post]
29 Apr 2012, 5:01 pm by Oliver
After G 1/09 had issued, there was quite some speculation on whether its verdict could be transferred to the case of deemed withdrawal. [read post]
26 Jan 2008, 1:41 pm
Jérôme Kerviel, a former trader at Société Générale, surrendered to the police on Saturday as investigators looked into what had caused the bank, one of Europe's largest, to lose more than $7 billion. [read post]
12 Feb 2022, 6:52 pm by Patent Docs
Ravi Srinivasan and Guy Brain of J A Kemp will cover recent developments in the assessment of whether a "plausible" disclosure of efficacy is present in the application as filed, including a discussion of the decision T 116/18 which has for the first time referred the topic of plausibility to the Enlarged Board of Appeal of the European Patent Office (pending as G 2/21). [read post]
26 Jun 2021, 9:21 pm by Patent Docs
John Leeming of J A Kemp will detail the approach of the EPO to computer-implemented inventions (including simulations) and consider what the recent G 01/19 does (and does not) tell us about the patentability of simulations and computer-implemented inventions in general, and also provide practical advice regarding the drafting and prosecution of applications directed to computer-implemented inventions in Europe in light of the decision. [read post]
21 Sep 2018, 12:58 am by sylvain
Le Règlement général sur la protection des données (RGPD) est entré en vigueur il y a plus de deux ans et nous en avons déjà beaucoup parlé. [read post]