Search for: "JENNINGS v. STATE"
Results 261 - 280
of 579
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Nov 2015, 2:49 am
Rather, a defendant must aim “to permanently deprive the victim[] of the property” (People v Medina, 18 NY3d 98, 105 [2011]; see People v Jennings, 69 NY2d at 118; People v Jacobs, 52 AD3d 432, 433 [2008], lv denied 11 NY3d 833 [2008]; see also People v Parker, 121 AD3d 1190, 1191 [2014]). [read post]
16 Apr 2013, 6:05 am
The Court also declined to review Jennings v. [read post]
6 Oct 2020, 7:49 am
”): State v. [read post]
29 Jul 2015, 6:48 am
Jennings, 69 N.Y.2d 103, 504 N.E.2d 1079 (1986). [read post]
29 Jun 2017, 11:29 am
Dimaya (questioning how the Fifth Amendment’s void-for-vagueness doctrine maps onto immigration statutes) and Jennings v. [read post]
13 Sep 2010, 5:11 am
United States, 294 U.S. 330 (1935); Nortz v. [read post]
29 Jun 2017, 9:25 am
The biggest immigration law case of the term undoubtedly would have been Jennings v. [read post]
18 Mar 2021, 11:26 am
Renault may not have intervened in all Nokia v. [read post]
17 Nov 2023, 4:00 am
Supreme Court’s denial of review in State v. [read post]
23 Feb 2018, 2:25 pm
(cross-posted at Lawfare) I have blogged a lot over the last two years on the pending case of United States v. [read post]
14 Jun 2016, 6:02 pm
Jennings v. [read post]
5 Feb 2024, 6:56 am
The Federal Circuit is hearing oral arguments today in the design patent case of LKQ Corporation v. [read post]
20 Apr 2020, 7:50 am
Along with Clarence Darrow, Dudley Field Malone defended John Scopes in the 1925 "Scopes Trial," formally known as State v. [read post]
19 Jan 2022, 7:03 am
Blinken will meet with Foreign Minister Sergey V. [read post]
19 Jul 2017, 6:59 pm
Whitford (October 3) Jennings v. [read post]
24 May 2019, 8:38 am
, Inc v Jen, Chi [2019] SGIPOS 3. [read post]
27 Sep 2017, 9:45 am
In Jennings v. [read post]
11 Apr 2024, 9:05 am
The benefits of filing a Form 1024-A would include public recognition of 501(c)(4) status and potential exemption from state taxes. [read post]
7 Jun 2018, 4:24 am
” Also at PrawfsBlawg, Leah Litman points out some areas of overlap between the government’s position in Jennings v. [read post]
