Search for: "JOHN DOE, official and individual" Results 261 - 280 of 3,269
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Jul 2022, 6:30 am by Mark Graber
  John Dewey, Louis Brandeis and others maintained that persons did not have individual rights to interfere with the common good. [read post]
1 Jun 2018, 3:08 am by Scott Bomboy
If a federal judge wants Donald Trump to stop blocking users on his Twitter account, does the President need to comply? [read post]
19 Apr 2019, 2:03 pm by Mark Graber
The investigation did not establish any agreement among Campaign officials or between such officials and Russia-linked individuals-to interfere with or obstruct a lawful function of a government agency during the campaign or transition period.. . . .2. [read post]
7 Jun 2014, 5:38 am by Charles (Chuck) Rubin
The following is a more detailed analysis by my partner, Richard (Rick) Josepher: WHAT DOES ZWERNER CASE MEAN TO PRACTITIONERS AND TO TAXPAYERS CONSIDERING MAKING VOLUNTARY DISCLOSURES OF OFFSHORE ACCOUNTS WHERE PENALTIES ARE NOT DETERMINED UNDER FORMAL OFFSHORE DISCLOSURE PROGRAMS? [read post]
22 Feb 2019, 12:30 pm by John K. Ross
He names "John Doe" in his complaint but also refers to the officer as "C.O. [read post]
19 Jul 2007, 1:18 pm
On the other hand, I agree that an official does not act outside the scope of his duties just because he violates the law. [read post]
15 Jun 2018, 5:01 am by Joanna Schwartz
The Court has justified its dramatic expansion of qualified immunity in the name of policy aims that the doctrine does not actually advance. [read post]
19 Sep 2008, 11:20 am
RubinsteinHarvey Randall comments: Concerning eavesdropping, Streed v Waterford-Halfmoon UFSD, [not officially reported] is a case involving the recording of a cordless telephone conversation between a teacher and a student by some unknown individual, who gave the tape to school district officials. [read post]
14 Dec 2018, 5:00 am by Sarah Grant, Chuck Rosenberg
Time to let more than [Clinton Campaign chairman John Podesta] be exposed [read post]
14 Oct 2011, 5:41 am by William Carleton
The First Amendment does not apply to private corporations or to individuals. [read post]
8 Jul 2015, 11:17 am by Lisa A. Mazzie
So, when I got to Chief Justice John Roberts’ dissent, it initially made some sense to me, and I could envision its appeal to many others. [read post]
18 Apr 2021, 2:56 pm by Eugene Volokh
The State Defendants shall not be liable for unintentional violations of this Order in the case of an individual who does not carry or wear a press pass, badge, or other official press credential or distinctive clothing that identifies the wearer as a member of the press. [5.] [read post]
9 Jun 2011, 1:17 pm by WIMS
 The BRC has taken the past year to hear official testimony and public comment, and will continue to do so as these reports are released. [read post]