Search for: "JOHN DOE DOCTORS 1-15"
Results 261 - 280
of 333
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Jun 2011, 1:57 am
Shively[1] From War to Warm Reception Home. [read post]
6 May 2011, 9:35 am
Yet sometimes the truth is too simple for some … The Warren Commission thought they had an open and shut case: three bullets, one assassin – but two things happened that made it virtually impossible: 1)the Zapruder film which you just saw, and 2)the third wounded man, Jim Tague, who was nicked by a fragment down by the Triple Underpass. [read post]
6 May 2011, 9:35 am
Last week I discussed how documentaries teach us to use different types of media to keep the jury’s attention. [read post]
9 Apr 2011, 3:48 pm
John R. [read post]
16 Mar 2011, 3:27 pm
How far does this principle go? [read post]
1 Mar 2011, 8:36 pm
Palmer with approval and then reviewed some additional cases: 15 In Bacher v. [read post]
13 Jan 2011, 9:18 am
The civil servant doesn't get a bonus for turning down claims, and neither does his boss. [read post]
13 Jan 2011, 9:18 am
The civil servant doesn't get a bonus for turning down claims, and neither does his boss. [read post]
26 Dec 2010, 10:19 pm
“But when it does, it’s a tragedy. [read post]
11 Dec 2010, 6:42 am
Susman, reasons 1.4 (b/d). 1. [read post]
29 Nov 2010, 7:18 am
§§ 1 & 2). [read post]
6 Nov 2010, 4:13 pm
Does the market really need or want it? [read post]
5 Oct 2010, 8:22 pm
Unless you are John Boehner it probably doesn't affect you. [read post]
5 Aug 2010, 9:23 am
Plaintiff Baby John Doe 1) $45,852.67 for past medical expenses 2) $1,500,000.00 for future medical expenses 3) $25,000.00 for pain and suffering 4) $75,000.00 for future lost wages TOTAL: $1,645,852.67 The verdict will be reduced by 15% to factor in the father's… [read post]
1 Jun 2010, 3:42 am
Bryan, the court says that the plaintiff’s attempt to use the “John Doe” naming procedure doesn’t work, because she knew the name of the doctor at the time she filed suit — she just didn’t know that he’d been negligent. [read post]
19 May 2010, 4:49 am
Three things need to be shown:(1) That there is a domestic relationship between the parties: s.11, s.20(1)(a);(2) That the respondent has committed an act of domestic violence against the aggrieved: s.20(1)(a); and(3) The respondent is likely to commit an act of domestic violence again or if the act of domestic violence was a threat – is likely to carry out the threat: s.20(1)(b).Domestic relationships are:(a) A spousal relationship. [read post]
17 May 2010, 5:49 am
At 1:15 p.m., the Court adjourned. [read post]
17 May 2010, 4:07 am
At 1:15 p.m., the Court adjourned. [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 10:14 pm
Today, John Odgren’s defense lawyer rested his case in the murder trial of the now 19-year-old young man who is accused of fatally stabbing 15-year-old James Alenson in a bathroom at Lincoln-Sudbury High School three years ago. [read post]
30 Mar 2010, 11:21 pm
Big M Drug Mart Ltd., [1985] 1 S.C.R. 295 at paras. 94, 96. [read post]
