Search for: "Jacobsen v. Jacobsen"
Results 261 - 280
of 336
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Dec 2008, 5:49 am
The IPKat is really disappointed that this action is being brought in the United States and not in Europe following last month's Intel v CPM ruling (see IPKat here and here), where counsel on both sides could indulge in endless argument as to the state of mind of the relevant consumer, the likelihood of confusion and the extent to which the use of the mark on the t-shirt might be expected to affect the economic activity of consumers of the claimant's rolling papers.Now that we all… [read post]
12 Dec 2008, 1:45 am
Pop Quiz: Today's lawsuit against Cisco over abusing open source software licenses is: A) The result of a Federal Circuit opinion in Jacobsen v Katzer that made open source licenses easier to enforce under copyright law. [read post]
11 Dec 2008, 8:58 pm
No doubt FSF feels more confident in the success of its copyright infringement claims after this past summer’s decision from the Federal Circuit in Jacobsen v. [read post]
5 Dec 2008, 11:02 pm
A discussion of litigation over US 6,530,329 (titled "Model train control system") in June 2006 earned IPBiz the following mention:Another article by a patent attorney discussed aspects of the case in June.The Lessig blog made out better for a post in 2008, and it didn't mention trains or JMRI. [read post]
23 Nov 2008, 5:01 am
Williams, 354 F.3d 497, 509 (6th Cir. 2003) (quoting Jacobsen, 466 U.S. at 114-15) (quotations omitted).The unpublished opinion in United States v. [read post]
15 Nov 2008, 12:31 am
Jacobsen v. [read post]
4 Nov 2008, 9:58 pm
Co. v. [read post]
3 Nov 2008, 11:21 am
U.S. v. [read post]
29 Sep 2008, 4:00 am
The case was People v. [read post]
27 Sep 2008, 6:27 pm
A second defendant got a Jacobsen remand so that the judge could clarify whether she sentenced him under the drug table or as a career offender.In United States v. [read post]
26 Sep 2008, 12:30 pm
In August, the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit issued a ruling (Jacobsen v. [read post]
24 Sep 2008, 4:21 pm
Jacobsen v. [read post]
17 Sep 2008, 9:46 am
Crosswinds Communities, Inc., 474 F.3d 227, 234 (6th Cir.2007) (noting the limited applicability of laches to copyright cases in "what can best be described as unusual circumstances"); Jacobsen v. [read post]
12 Sep 2008, 2:33 pm
: Nine v IceTV: (International Law Office) Benelux Some new rules of the Director-General of the Benelux Organisation for Intellectual Property with regard to trade mark filings refused on absolute grounds and withdrawal of oppositions: (Class 46) Brazil Brazil exports agricultural technology to developing world: (IP tango) Canada Conservatives website faces claims of copyright infringement: (Michael Geist), Canada’s trade mark opposition practice… [read post]
9 Sep 2008, 4:49 pm
Contracts * Jacobsen v. [read post]
6 Sep 2008, 9:13 am
Essentially, software programmers put up programming code that anyone can download, modify, use and distribute for free, as long as the "borrowed" or "open source" code is clearly indicated and enabled for the distributee to copy, download and use.On August 13, 2008, the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit decided Jacobsen v. [read post]
5 Sep 2008, 11:01 pm
& Ors v Deisel Spa and Case C-302/08 Zino Davidoff SA v Bendesfinanzdirektion Sudost: (Class 46), EPO Boards of Appeal finds that when a fax is transmitted and an ‘OK’ is noted by the sender, this is evidence that the transmission was successful: (IPKat), Professor Hugenholtz slams European Commission for ignoring evidence on copyright extension: (Techdirt) Germany Federal Patent Court publishes guidelines on colour trade mark Signal Yellow:… [read post]
5 Sep 2008, 7:18 am
(Jacobsen v. [read post]
30 Aug 2008, 11:57 pm
Several people have commented that switching from grain to grass feeding could be one of the solutions to the problem with foodborne pathogens in cattle and other livestock. [read post]
29 Aug 2008, 1:25 pm
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: CAFC sets strict standards to establish inequitable conduct: Star Scientific v R J Reynolds Tobacco: (Hal Wegner), (Maryland Intellectual Property Law Blog), (Patent Prospector), (Patent Docs), (Patently-O), (more from Patently-O), (Philip Brooks), (Law360), (I/P Updates), Safe harbour ruling in Io v Veoh could help YouTube in Viacom… [read post]
