Search for: "John Roe 2"
Results 261 - 280
of 338
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Dec 2011, 5:43 am
Roe would be held liable without ever being given a chance to defend himself. [read post]
28 Nov 2011, 6:03 am
That puts Roe in a bad spot: If the jury believes what John says – i.e., that Jane heard Roe confess to the murder for which he is on trial – they’re almost certainly going to convict him (unless he’s arguing self-defense, say). [read post]
17 Nov 2011, 1:59 pm
Kevin Cieply, John Marshall – Rape as a War Crime) / Discussant: Prof. [read post]
15 Aug 2011, 11:50 am
In other words, the Court ought to avoid the Scylla of Roe v. [read post]
8 Jun 2011, 5:54 am
Note that Simkovic’s work is more incrementalist than that of Stephen Lubben (another colleague of mine) or Mark Roe, who question the wisdom of safe harbors for derivatives in bankruptcy. [read post]
30 May 2011, 5:19 pm
Pursuant to Civil Rights Law §50-a and Public Officers Law Article 6-A, Roe and Doe were entitled to declaratory relief in that police disciplinary hearings must be confidential; and 2. [read post]
10 May 2011, 4:21 am
Pursuant to Civil Rights Law §50-a and Public Officers Law Article 6-A, Roe and Doe were entitled to declaratory relief in that police disciplinary hearings must be confidential; and 2. [read post]
4 Apr 2011, 4:00 am
Siegel, Before (and after) Roe V. [read post]
4 Mar 2011, 1:48 pm
John Kline (R-MN), and the Chairman of the Subcommittee on Health, Education, Labor & Pensions, Rep. [read post]
1 Mar 2011, 5:44 am
Johns Law School and New York Law School, All rights reserved.Matter of Rivers v. [read post]
31 Jan 2011, 4:00 am
Press, Feb. 2011).John M. [read post]
28 Nov 2010, 1:15 pm
Wade; 2) Actually overruling Roe in those circumstances would have created the impression that the Court responds directly to political pressure; 3) That impression would undermine the Court's legitimacy; and therefore 4) The Court should avoid overruling unless the case for overruling is extraordinarily strong. [read post]
2 Nov 2010, 8:01 pm
(A Great Roe has the head of a lion and the body of a lion, but not the same lion.) [read post]
30 Oct 2010, 8:41 am
" In re Richard Roe, Inc., 168 F.3d 69, 72 (2d Cir. 1999). . . . [read post]
4 Oct 2010, 2:57 pm
Friedman and Lithwick sometimes seem to claim that the Court is bound by past precedent, as in this exchange: Here's another example: Roe v. [read post]
9 Sep 2010, 8:05 pm
http://www.nytimes.com/2005/07/20/politics/politicsspecial1/20cases.html July 20, 2005 A Career Largely on One Side of the Bench and Involving a Wide Variety of Issues By ADAM LIPTAK John G. [read post]
5 Sep 2010, 10:00 am
In Colorado, it is possible though difficult to sue anonymously by filing suit under a pseudonym such as "John Doe" or "Jane Roe. [read post]
8 Jul 2010, 5:34 am
What we’ve seen this year is the birth of John Roberts’ Court. [read post]
7 Jul 2010, 2:47 pm
Gilson Reinier Kraakman Bernard Black Donald Langevoort Robert Thompson Runners-up for the top ten Henry Hansmann Mark Roe Lynn Stout Stephen Choi Jill Fisch Highly Cited Scholars Whose Cites Are Not Exclusively in This Area Jonathan Macey Melvin Eisenberg On which I count between 2 and 4 empiricists. [read post]
17 May 2010, 5:30 pm
Here's the corporate law rankings: Rank Name School Total Articles Citing Name Age in 2010 1 John Coffee Columbia University 1500 66 2 Lucian Bebchuk Harvard University 1060 55 3 Larry Ribstein University of Illinois 960 64 4 Stephen Bainbridge University of California, Los Angeles 850 52 5 Roberta… [read post]
