Search for: "Johnson v. United States Government"
Results 261 - 280
of 2,042
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 May 2011, 8:44 am
This was the riddle that recently occupied a nine-judge panel of the Supreme Court in R (Adams) v Secretary of State for Justice [2011] UKSC 18. [read post]
29 Sep 2004, 12:28 pm
In United States v. [read post]
16 Aug 2007, 9:09 am
Johnson, 910 F.2d 1506 (7th Cir.1990), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 1051, 111 S.Ct. 764, 112 L.Ed.2d 783 (1991); United States v. [read post]
31 Dec 2013, 2:39 pm
State governments have also taken an interest. [read post]
15 Mar 2019, 4:00 am
As a question of substantial evidence was raised by Petitioner, the proceeding was transferred to the Appellate Division.Citing Matter of Haug v State Univ. of N.Y. at Potsdam, 32 NY3d 1044, the Appellate Division noted that the Court of Appeals had recently reviewed the principles governing judicial review of administrative determinations under the substantial evidence standard and noted that, as relevant in this action, the high court had emphasized that "the… [read post]
15 Mar 2019, 4:00 am
As a question of substantial evidence was raised by Petitioner, the proceeding was transferred to the Appellate Division.Citing Matter of Haug v State Univ. of N.Y. at Potsdam, 32 NY3d 1044, the Appellate Division noted that the Court of Appeals had recently reviewed the principles governing judicial review of administrative determinations under the substantial evidence standard and noted that, as relevant in this action, the high court had emphasized that "the… [read post]
9 Sep 2019, 1:17 pm
ICYMI: Last Weekend on Lawfare Asfandyar Mir analyzed the continued challenge that Al-Qaeda poses to the United States. [read post]
2 Feb 2009, 8:01 pm
Senator Johnson's legislation would prohibit a registered sex offender from living anywhere in New York State within 1,000 feet of a school building, park, or day care center, for at least ten years after release, and would impose criminal penalties for violations.Because Oberlander held that State law and policy pre-empted action by local units of government with regard to sex offender residency restrictions [SORR], and… [read post]
23 Jul 2012, 2:47 pm
In Johnson v. [read post]
19 May 2007, 10:12 am
Each of these three men is assisting their government in its efforts to kill them. [read post]
24 Jun 2024, 1:01 pm
The case was filed as United States ex rel. [read post]
26 Apr 2022, 7:48 am
The Supreme Court in Zivotofsky v. [read post]
7 Jan 2019, 2:34 pm
See United States v. [read post]
20 Sep 2007, 4:05 am
The Government argues that the retroactive application of Johnson does not violate the Due Process Clause because the Supreme Court's judicial interpretation of the statute was neither unexpected nor indefensible.In a recent unpublished decision, United States v. [read post]
9 May 2018, 4:35 pm
United States 16-7667 Issue: Whether — after the Supreme Court’s decision in Johnson v. [read post]
11 Jul 2024, 9:24 am
§ 80m(a)(2) (Powers of Board), an Institution’s Board is empowered to make transfers of property in its collection.[28] Likewise, the Court held that the transfer did not breach the trust relationship because “only the United States holds legal title to the Smithsonian collection as its trustee”.[29] While the Institution may be treated as a federal agency in some respects, it is more so regarded as among the “instrumentalities wholly owned by the… [read post]
23 Jun 2008, 3:05 pm
United States - addressing whether a federal court of appeals may increase a criminal defendant's sentence in the absence of a cross-appeal by the government. [read post]
6 Oct 2008, 12:15 pm
United States v. [read post]
11 Aug 2007, 8:22 am
United States v. [read post]
15 Oct 2012, 8:46 am
He was later tracked and stopped by the canine unit. [read post]
