Search for: "Joint Industry Board v. United States"
Results 261 - 280
of 315
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Jan 2016, 8:00 am
In the case, Authors Guild v. [read post]
19 May 2010, 4:36 pm
Circuit’s recent decision in Comcast v. [read post]
19 Oct 2021, 10:10 am
Jan. 27, 2016); Bartnett v. [read post]
2 Jun 2014, 4:11 am
Civil (i.e., non-criminal) “reviewable matters” under the Act include abuse of dominance (or monopolization as it is referred to in the United States under the Sherman Act), civil misleading advertising, refusal to deal, price maintenance and certain types of “vertical” restraints by dominant firms (e.g., exclusive dealing and tied selling). [read post]
4 Aug 2010, 12:36 pm
United States, Fed. [read post]
December 21, 2009 – Environmental Law Settlements, Decisions, Regulatory Actions and Lawsuit Filings
21 Dec 2009, 10:57 am
— Imelda V. [read post]
23 Dec 2009, 4:42 pm
— Imelda V. [read post]
6 Mar 2023, 1:37 pm
Disrupt & Dismantle Threat Actors Pillar 2 discussed the commitment to use “all instruments of national power to disrupt and dismantle threat actors whose actions threaten our interests,” focusing on heading off “sustained cyber-enabled campaigns that would threaten the national security or public safety of the United States. [read post]
19 Jul 2010, 3:37 pm
The $4 million civil penalty will be divided among the United States, Alabama and Iowa. [read post]
10 Jan 2013, 1:21 pm
Regulation § 46.4376-2(b)(2) defines plan sponsor to mean the following: The employer for a self-insured health plan established or maintained by a single employer; The employee organization for a self-insured health plan established or maintained by an employee organization; The joint board of trustees for a multiemployer plan within the meaning of Code §414(f)); The committee, in the case of a multiple employer welfare arrangement within the meaning of Section… [read post]
13 Jan 2021, 3:00 am
March Joint Powers Authority (2009) 174 Cal.App.4th 1135; Friends of Juana Briones House v. [read post]
13 Jan 2021, 3:00 am
March Joint Powers Authority (2009) 174 Cal.App.4th 1135; Friends of Juana Briones House v. [read post]
10 May 2022, 4:25 am
The Nordic region’s defense capabilities would be strengthened if Sweden and Finland joined NATO, allowing joint defense planning withi [read post]
13 Jan 2020, 11:57 am
Friday, Jan. 17, 1:00 p.m.: The Center for Strategic and International Studies will hold a conversation with vice chairman of the joint chiefs of staff General John Hyten on the Joint Force’s response to new security challenges. [read post]
10 May 2017, 10:20 am
Stamer also shares her thought leadership, experience and advocacy on these and other concerns by her service in the leadership of a broad range of other professional and civic organization including her involvement as the Vice Chair of the North Texas Healthcare Compliance Association; Executive Director of the Coalition on Responsible Health Policy and its PROJECT COPE: Coalition on Patient Empowerment; former Board President of the early childhood development intervention agency, The… [read post]
4 May 2022, 4:25 am
Dzhabarov told the state-run RIA Novosti news agency Europe’s leaders “have gone a little crazy”. [read post]
10 Jul 2019, 4:17 am
Overview of the Regulation A+ Offering Circular for Crypto Tokens By Bart Mallon Co-Managing Partner, Cole-Frieman & Mallon LLP It is generally accepted that the initial coin offering (ICO) from mid-2017 is dead and that firms raising money for their blockchain or token projects will need to do so in a way that is compliant with SEC laws and regulations. [read post]
12 Apr 2010, 10:44 am
The EPA granted the waiver to the California Air Resources Board in January 2009, giving the agency the authority to enforce regulations related to Transport Refrigeration Units, or TRUs. [read post]
7 Jul 2010, 11:07 am
Johnson forAmici Curiae United Trustee’s Association and California Mortgage Association.Leland Chan for Amicus Curiae California Bankers Association.I. [read post]
22 Feb 2016, 4:36 pm
In 1968, a court decision, Escott v. [read post]
