Search for: "Jones v. King*" Results 261 - 280 of 496
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Apr 2007, 11:30 am
Complete Collection of State Trials and Proceedings for High Treason and Other Crimes and Misdemeanors 33 v., index (1809-1826) Howell, Thomas Bayly (Compiler); Howell, Thomas Jones (Compiler). [read post]
2 Mar 2010, 4:04 pm by INFORRM
Jones v Associated Newspapers Ltd, June 2007,  Eady J and a Jury. [read post]
15 Feb 2020, 4:39 pm by INFORRM
Mother Jones has an article by Madison Pauly, “She Said, He Sued: How libel law is being turned against MeToo accusers”. [read post]
12 May 2019, 4:36 pm by INFORRM
The LSE Media Policy Project blog has piece by Holly Powell-Jones entitled Online abuse: teenagers might not report it because they often don’t see it as a problem The TGI de Paris ruled on 9 A;pril 2019 that Facebook’s T&Cs on user-generated copyright content were unclear and confusing and were were unfair under the consumer code. [read post]
25 Jun 2017, 4:11 pm by INFORRM
’ Guardian journalist Owen Jones branded the Daily Mail an ‘open sewer’ after the paper’s attack on the Guardian. [read post]
22 Nov 2021, 6:34 am by INFORRM
United States Alex Jones has been found guilty by default in all four defamation cases brought by the families of victims of the Sandy Hook school shooting tragedy. [read post]
1 Jul 2024, 12:05 am by INFORRM
Hawrami v Journalism Development Network Inc and others, 17 June 2024 (Steyn J) Vince v Associated Newspapers, heard 19 February 2024 (HHJ Lewis) Pacini v Dow Jones, heard 13 December 2023 (HHJ Parkes KC) Harcombe v Associated Newspapers, heard 3 to 7 and 10 to 11 July 2023 (Nicklin J) MBR Acres v FREE THE [read post]
6 Apr 2023, 9:05 pm by Victoria Hawekotte
Supreme Court’s decision in West Virginia v. [read post]
9 Jan 2014, 4:31 pm
It sounds tranquil, but she was in the midst of reading a beast of a judgment from Mr Justice Floyd (as he then was) in the ongoing Virgin Atlantic saga in Virgin Atlantic v Zodiac [2013] EWCA Civ 1713. [read post]
15 Jan 2015, 4:04 pm by INFORRM
(a)  Hodge Jones & Allen LLP v Times Newspapers Ltd (b)  Brand v NGN (c)  Walliams v NGN (d)  Fernandez-Versini v Bauer Consumer Media Ltd (21)  The following 8 quotes are either from Sir Alan Moses or Christian Bale playing Moses in Exodus: Gods and Kings. [read post]
26 Jan 2015, 8:25 am by INFORRM
(a)  Hodge Jones & Allen LLP v Times Newspapers Ltd (b)  Brand v NGN (c)  Walliams v NGN (d)  Fernandez-Versini v Bauer Consumer Media Ltd (21)  The following 8 quotes are either from Sir Alan Moses or Christian Bale playing Moses in Exodus: Gods and Kings. [read post]
23 Feb 2023, 7:07 am by Eleonora Rosati
Nestle v Cadbury [2022] EWHC 1671 (Ch) (July 2022)You can’t trade mark a colour. [read post]
1 Mar 2010, 7:11 pm
(ipeg) (IP Watch) Holding up products at EU borders using patents (ipeg) Improving the links between ESOs and the European Patent Office (IP:JUR) General Court affirms earlier Board of Appeal's decision that "James Jones" is confusingly similar to "JACK & JONES", in connection with clothing in Class 25 (Class 46) Clutter on the Community Trademark Register (SOLO Independent IP Practitioners) No strange aroma, but will Longkou Fen Si pass the test? [read post]
1 Apr 2011, 5:13 am by INFORRM
See Reynolds v Times Newspapers Limited [2001] 2 AC 127 HL, which created the defence, and Jameel v Wall Street Journal Europe Sprl [2007] 1 AC 359 HL, which revitalised it. [read post]
1 Mar 2010, 7:11 pm
(ipeg) (IP Watch) Holding up products at EU borders using patents (ipeg) Improving the links between ESOs and the European Patent Office (IP:JUR) General Court affirms earlier Board of Appeal's decision that "James Jones" is confusingly similar to "JACK & JONES", in connection with clothing in Class 25 (Class 46) Clutter on the Community Trademark Register (SOLO Independent IP Practitioners) No strange aroma, but will Longkou Fen Si pass the test? [read post]
9 Jun 2006, 5:49 am by Tobias Thienel
Jones (Margaret) [2006] UKHL 16, [2006] 2 WLR 772, at para. 67; the question did not arise squarely for decision; a submission to the same effect was recorded, but not decided by the Court of Appeal in Republic of Ecuador v. [read post]