Search for: "Joshua Rozenberg"
Results 261 - 280
of 303
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 May 2011, 12:19 am
However, to save falling foul of our many readers who believe that the press has dined out far too much on this topic, a selection of recent press and blog news items is included for you to pick and choose à la carte and digest at your leisure: A digest of recent news (1) – UK judgments May 30, 2011, RPC Privacy Blog (The latest news in privacy law) “Super-injunctions”, Twitter and Gagging the Press May 27, 2011, Mark Thompson, Inforrm’s Blog A matter of will:… [read post]
4 Jun 2012, 12:40 am
Joshua Rozenberg has written an excellent article in the Guardian setting out the course of events. [read post]
21 May 2012, 1:18 am
Joshua Rozenberg, in his article in the Guardian, agrees, concluding that “If Sumption has anything to do with it – and now of course he does – the foreign secretary of the day will soon be held to account in much the same way as the Home Secretary is already. [read post]
19 Jun 2022, 5:19 am
Joshua Rozenberg comments, incisively as always, here. [read post]
22 May 2012, 8:03 am
For the full background, see my post from last week or Joshua Rozenberg’s excellent article on Guardian.co.uk. [read post]
27 Jun 2010, 9:13 am
In this regular feature we draw attention to the last week’s law and media news and next week’s upcoming events. [read post]
10 Oct 2011, 1:26 am
In other news Joshua Rozenberg wrote a piece in the Law Gazette about the increasing interest in studying the judiciary, in particular in what concerns the appointment of judges and its implications to the judiciary’s independence, quality and diversity. [read post]
14 Feb 2016, 11:46 am
Undermining human rights bodies: reactions to the opinion of the Working Group on Assange It is not the purpose of this commentary to assess the content of the opinion of the Working Group, largely criticised for its shaky legal foundations elsewhere (see for instance: Mathew Happold here, Joshua Rozenberg here, or a more nuanced view by Liora Lazarus here). [read post]
16 Jul 2012, 12:49 am
The decision has generated some commentary in the Guardian: Joshua Rozenberg’s article discussed the relative merits of each candidate (focusing mainly on Lord Neuberger and Lady Hale) and set out his interpretation of the new President’s ethos (Lord Neuberger is a strong supporter of Parliamentary Sovereignty); Owen Bowcott also weighed in, emphasising some of Lord Neuberger’s more “liberal” aspects. [read post]
1 Nov 2011, 4:47 am
Journalist and law commentator Joshua Rozenberg chaired the discussion. [read post]
26 Sep 2011, 1:37 am
Joshua Rozenberg reported that the first few steps to be taken by the phone-hacking inquiry will be the conducting of three teaching sessions on the law, possible regulatory models and the mechanics of phone-hacking. [read post]
25 Jul 2011, 1:07 am
See coverage in the Guardian by Joshua Rozenberg here, and Adam Wagner’s commentary to the judgment here. [read post]
24 Jul 2010, 5:29 pm
There was a post on Joshua Rozenberg’s blog. [read post]
5 Oct 2011, 4:05 am
Legal writer Joshua Rozenberg has told Legal Week that many national newspapers no longer have a designated legal correspondent, meaning that they “don’t provide the service they did“. [read post]
10 Jan 2011, 4:31 am
Joshua Rozenberg has written about the forthcoming hearing in the “Guardian”. [read post]
1 Apr 2012, 11:00 pm
Joshua Rozenberg, also writing for the Guardian, attacks the value of the judicial “meritocracy” too, pointing out that even the old system under the Lord Chancellor was more flexible and thus more useful for tailoring appointments to improve the effectiveness of the senior judiciary as a whole. [read post]
30 Jan 2012, 5:23 pm
Of the responses that I have read, there is very little support for the proposals as they stand and, as journalist Joshua Rozenberg has pointed out, the most damning criticism has come from the very lawyers who are currently involved in “closed” proceedings. [read post]
10 Apr 2022, 1:05 am
An alternative possibility is that it might seek to repeal s 8 of the 1900 Act, but, as Joshua Rozenberg points out, “that could be tricky and might require hybrid legislation. [read post]
20 Sep 2011, 5:59 am
The Commission made recommendations to achieve the “effective functioning of the Court over the long term”, following which Joshua Rozenberg stated that “everybody now agrees on the need for fundamental reform. [read post]
5 May 2021, 10:54 am
-based Joshua Rozenberg, who publishes the newsletter A Lawyer Writes, where he covers and comments on developments in the law. [read post]
