Search for: "Judicial Officers in State of Tennessee" Results 261 - 280 of 466
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Nov 2013, 8:29 am by John Elwood
Hurles, 12-1472 (asking whether it is per se unreasonable for a state not to provide an evidentiary hearing on a judicial-bias claim), and Rapelje v. [read post]
11 Nov 2013, 6:08 am by John Day
For the twelve month period ending June 30, 2013, there were a total of 385 health care liability actions filed in Tennessee state courts. [read post]
6 Nov 2013, 6:31 am by John Elwood
Tennessee, 13-5086, is a capital case from Tennessee state court raising a number of challenges implicating issues already on the Court’s docket. [read post]
23 Oct 2013, 11:59 am by John Elwood
Hurles, 12-1472 (asking whether it is per se unreasonable for a state not to provide an evidentiary hearing on a judicial-bias claim), Rapelje v. [read post]
27 Sep 2013, 5:55 am
State, 182 Tenn. 577 (Tennessee Supreme Court 1945). [read post]
3 Sep 2013, 5:20 am by Timothy P. Flynn
 The Texas Attorney General has intervened in the divorce proceedings, asserting the divorces issued by the family courts are invalid because they implicitly recognize same-sex marriage; something proscribed by Texas law.Cases in Tennessee and Kentucky are also percolating through the state courts, testing state laws proscribing same-sex marriage. [read post]
3 Jul 2013, 10:37 am by Timothy Huebner
Three years later, with Johnson out of office, Congress returned the size of the Court to nine Justices, where it has remained ever since. [read post]
27 May 2013, 10:02 am by The Charge
Tennessee,532 U.S. 451 (2001), Mr. [read post]
18 Mar 2013, 4:49 am by Gritsforbreakfast
The Dallas Morning News this morning published a column I wrote arguing for state Rep. [read post]
9 Mar 2013, 7:33 pm by Mark Zamora
Our office is investigating incidents, 404-451-7781 or toll free 855-525-3955. [read post]
27 Feb 2013, 7:00 am by Benjamin Wittes
Bates has written, “How is it that judicial approval is required when the United States decides to target a U.S. citizen overseas for electronic surveillance, but that, according to [the government], judicial scrutiny is prohibited when the United States decides to target a U.S. citizen overseas for death? [read post]
10 Feb 2013, 2:12 pm by Steve Vladeck
The hardest question is what, exactly, the government would be seeking judicial review of at this stage… Some possibilities, among others: Whether the target is in fact a belligerent who can be targeted as part of the non-international armed conflict between the United States and al Qaeda and its affiliates; Whether the target does in fact present an imminent threat to the United States and/or U.S. persons overseas (although the definition of “imminent”… [read post]
9 Feb 2013, 8:29 am by Lee Davis
“I’m grateful for the opportunity to serve the state on the Court of Appeals, and I will give my full effort and commitment to performing the duties of judicial office diligently and impartially while promoting trust and confidence in the Tennessee judiciary. [read post]
28 Jan 2013, 10:57 am by Venkat
Interestingly, the statute was sponsored by Facebook’s ex-Chief Privacy Officer. [read post]
20 Dec 2012, 7:20 pm by J. Gordon Hylton
On the other hand, the South was much more successful in controlling the executive and judicial branches of the government, especially the offices of President and Supreme Court justice. [read post]
20 Nov 2012, 8:27 am
Tennessee Code 50-4-108; states the following for suppression of evidence,(a) Any person aggrieved by an unlawful inspection of premises named in an administrative inspection warrant may in any judicial or administrative proceeding move to suppress any evidence or information received, or moves for the return of any item seized, by the agency pursuant to the inspection. [read post]
20 Nov 2012, 8:27 am
Tennessee Code 50-4-108; states the following for suppression of evidence,(a) Any person aggrieved by an unlawful inspection of premises named in an administrative inspection warrant may in any judicial or administrative proceeding move to suppress any evidence or information received, or moves for the return of any item seized, by the agency pursuant to the inspection. [read post]
Tax Court Federal Retirement Thrift Investment Board Tennessee Valley Authority National Capital Planning Commission National Council on Disability Smithsonian Institution Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission Federal Reserve System Social Security Administration National Archives and Records Administration Nuclear Regulatory Commission National Foundation on the Arts and the Humanities National Credit Union Administration National Labor Relations Board LEGISLATIVE BRANCH United… [read post]