Search for: "Justice v. Stevens et al"
Results 261 - 280
of 349
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Sep 2009, 5:35 am
NFL, et al (08-661) case (argument date unscheduled), which will test whether the National Football League's exclusive apparel licensing deal with Reebok violates antitrust rules. [read post]
14 Sep 2009, 6:01 am
Florida Department of Environmental Protection, et al., Salazar v. [read post]
4 Sep 2009, 2:48 pm
” In 2003, in the case of McConnell, et al., v. [read post]
10 Jul 2009, 3:39 pm
CONNORS, a Minor, etc., et al., Real Parties in Interest. [read post]
8 Jul 2009, 3:27 pm
Southeast Alaska Conservation Counsel, et al., 557 U.S. ____ (2009). [read post]
29 Jun 2009, 10:51 am
This is speculation, of course, but there is little else to suggest why the Court announced Monday that, next Term, it will review the case of Briscoe, et al., v. [read post]
29 Jun 2009, 7:40 am
The Court has released the opinion in Ricci, et al. v. [read post]
25 Jun 2009, 10:15 am
Atlantic Sounding Co., Inc., et al. v. [read post]
18 Jun 2009, 7:20 am
The Court has released the opinion in District Attorney's Office for the Third Judicial District, et al. v. [read post]
18 Jun 2009, 7:16 am
Bailey, et al. (08-295). [read post]
11 Jun 2009, 12:04 pm
The bail issue (application 08A1063) is separate from the Supreme Court’s planned review of Black’s conviction; the Justices will hear and decide that case next Term (Black, et al., v. [read post]
7 Jun 2009, 3:00 am
Stevens (08-769) and due Wednesday in Jones, et al., v. [read post]
1 Jun 2009, 7:03 am
The case is Morrison, et al., v. [read post]
4 May 2009, 2:26 pm
In the present case, Burlington Northern and Santa Fe Railroads et al. v. [read post]
4 May 2009, 7:09 am
The Court has released the opinion in Arthur Andersen LLP, et al. v. [read post]
30 Apr 2009, 6:46 am
Note: David was on the Stanford team that along with Howe & Russell filed an amicus brief in this case on behalf of Lawyers' Committee for Civil Rights Under Law et al. [read post]
28 Apr 2009, 12:41 pm
CBS Corp., et al. (08-653), that involves brief exposures of nudity on TV. [read post]
28 Apr 2009, 7:05 am
Fox Television Stations, et al. (07-582). [read post]
21 Apr 2009, 3:28 pm
Gant (No. 07-542)(PDF), Justice Stevens2 has all but overruled Belton. [read post]
21 Apr 2009, 6:49 am
Randy Henning, et al., Case Nos. 98,118 & 98,119 (argued 09/03/08). [read post]
