Search for: "KAY v. STATE"
Results 261 - 280
of 639
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 May 2022, 1:04 pm
The Supreme Court has voted to overturn the landmark 1973 Roe v. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 4:38 pm
" Armstrong v. [read post]
16 Oct 2009, 6:16 am
The question in Kay v. [read post]
1 Apr 2009, 4:35 pm
The appeal to the CJ, which was heard shortly after Kay v Lambeth in the Lords, was allowed on the basis that, given the Council’s letter, quoted above, it was seriously arguable that the Council had acted in a way no reasonable person would consider justifiable. [read post]
27 Jul 2022, 11:44 am
Anderson sat down with Derek Muller to discuss the independent state legislature doctrine in light of the pending Supreme Court case Moore v. [read post]
14 Sep 2010, 4:11 pm
It cited Turner v. [read post]
23 Jun 2010, 3:51 pm
Div. 1981); State v. [read post]
15 Apr 2015, 2:26 pm
Kay testified that using the stated interest rate and the default interest rate contained in the original terms of the mortgage, and crediting the payments by the Wife, there is accrued interest of over $1.5 million now owed on the original mortgage as computed between May 1993 and December 2005. [read post]
25 Apr 2016, 5:00 am
It is now clear that the subjects in charge of collecting the fair compensation for private copying (e.g. collective management organisations) can bring proceedings before the courts of the Member State where the harm arising from missed payments is felt. [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 7:54 am
"The state corrective process as a whole was ineffective," Brandt said.The opinion in Balentine v. [read post]
17 Jan 2008, 4:35 pm
Early scrutiny of methods used during questioning of such persons occurred in the landmark decision of the European Court of Human Rights in Ireland v. [read post]
9 Aug 2011, 1:53 pm
In addition, Oklahoma's Electric Restructuring Act expressed an unmistakable policy preference for competition in the provision of electricity, according to the court.The decision is Kay Electric Cooperative v. [read post]
25 Jul 2010, 12:10 pm
" Considering the issue of Articles 10 and 11 it was held by the Court that this case was not similar to Kay or Doherty as no balancing act had been carried out during the passing of the legislation. [read post]
25 Jul 2010, 12:10 pm
" Considering the issue of Articles 10 and 11 it was held by the Court that this case was not similar to Kay or Doherty as no balancing act had been carried out during the passing of the legislation. [read post]
17 Jun 2005, 2:55 pm
Alvarez-Machain and the Second Circuit in Flores v. [read post]
20 Mar 2012, 7:05 am
Corby BC v Scott & West Kent Housing Association v Haycraft [2012] EWCA Civ 276 are the first cases that have required the Court of Appeal to consider and apply the guidance given in Powell v Hounslow LBC [2011] UKSC 8 & Pinnock v Manchester CC [2010] UKSC 45 (our notes here & here). [read post]
20 Mar 2012, 7:05 am
Corby BC v Scott & West Kent Housing Association v Haycraft [2012] EWCA Civ 276 are the first cases that have required the Court of Appeal to consider and apply the guidance given in Powell v Hounslow LBC [2011] UKSC 8 & Pinnock v Manchester CC [2010] UKSC 45 (our notes here & here). [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 6:33 am
Although Doherty had not been decided at the time that Kay & Price was, the ECtHR analysis of Kay (in Kay v UK) took the somewhat unusual step of referring to Doherty and finding that not only did the Gateways as outlined in Kay & Price not fulfil the requirements of Article 8, but neither did they as functionally expanded (albeit slightly) in Doherty. [read post]
11 Aug 2009, 7:00 am
By Glen Hansen In Lin v. [read post]
3 Jun 2008, 8:51 am
Case Name: Wyoming Bd. of Land Commissioners v. [read post]
