Search for: "Kelo v. New London " Results 261 - 280 of 288
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Apr 2008, 1:11 pm
Their appeal, if granted by the Court, would pose  a major test of the scope of the Court’s 5-4 decision in Kelo v. [read post]
1 Apr 2008, 12:20 pm
City of New London, 545 U.S. 469, 478 (2005), a rule of general application, or is it limited to takings justified solely on economic development grounds? [read post]
6 Feb 2008, 6:33 am
City of New London, 545 U.S. 469, 491 (2005) (Kennedy, J., concurring). [read post]
26 Nov 2007, 10:48 pm
New London, in which the Court upheld a city's use of eminent domain for economic development purposes under the Fifth Amendment's Takings Clause. [read post]
28 Oct 2007, 4:00 pm
  The initiative was apparently in reaction to the US Supreme Court's decision in Kelo v. [read post]
26 Oct 2007, 4:46 am
  The initiative was apparently in reaction to the US Supreme Court's decision in Kelo v. [read post]
27 Jun 2007, 9:29 pm
  This case follows the roadmap set out by the Court in Kelo v. [read post]
26 Jun 2007, 9:14 pm
City of New London, it would be understandable if property owners felt under siege. [read post]
25 Jun 2007, 7:10 am
Supreme Court's controversial 2005 decision in Kelo v New London (545 US 469) greatly expanded the government's power of eminent domain by holding that the government could transfer land from one private owner to another to further economic development. [read post]
14 Jun 2007, 2:15 pm
  The nadir of such reasoning was 2005's Kelo v. [read post]
11 Jun 2007, 11:32 am
  New Jersey law blog posts a summary here. [read post]