Search for: "Kent v. United States"
Results 261 - 280
of 779
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Oct 2014, 3:12 am
” At Crime and Consequences, Kent Scheidegger analyzes this week’s oral argument in the habeas appeal case Jennings v. [read post]
7 Aug 2012, 3:19 pm
Kent State University, 669 F.3d 1349 (Fed. [read post]
30 Jun 2022, 12:43 pm
In Moore v. [read post]
6 Dec 2013, 3:52 am
” At ACSblog, Erwin Chemerinsky discussed Wednesday’s oral argument in United States v. [read post]
30 Oct 2018, 3:50 am
” At Crime & Consequences, Kent Scheidegger observes that United States v. [read post]
6 Jun 2023, 7:30 am
United States, 315 U. [read post]
25 Sep 2007, 3:16 am
KENT, KIMBERLY, ET AL.The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted. [read post]
21 Feb 2015, 4:47 pm
United States v. [read post]
19 Mar 2013, 6:58 am
Bartlett, No. 12-142 – is being argued in the United States Supreme Court today. [read post]
5 Nov 2015, 4:43 am
United States, in which a man who pleaded guilty to possessing child pornography is challenging his ten-year sentence enhancement based on a prior state conviction. [read post]
21 Apr 2020, 3:59 am
In Ramos v. [read post]
10 Dec 2014, 4:54 am
In Weeks v. [read post]
7 Mar 2007, 5:15 am
Balkin and Sanford LevinsonDred Scott v. [read post]
Despite Setbacks, Department of Justice Charges Full Speed Ahead in Litigating Labor Antitrust Cases
2 May 2022, 8:46 am
In United States v. [read post]
17 Oct 2011, 7:01 am
The Hill discusses some of the amicus briefs filed recently in support of respondent Antoine Jones in United States v. [read post]
10 Aug 2009, 10:00 pm
Sec. 337(a), only the United States can enforce the Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act. [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 6:20 am
United States, the other case to be argued this morning, and lays out the conflict implicit in Pepper: between utilitarian and retributivist approaches to sentencing. [read post]
16 Jan 2019, 3:43 am
United States, the justices ruled 5-4 yesterday that a state-law robbery conviction can qualify as a “violent felony” for the purposes of a sentencing enhancement under the Armed Career Criminal Act even when the conviction does not require the use of violent force. [read post]
22 Jul 2011, 7:54 am
Rogelio Casados and Rafaela Casados, No. 10-0523 In re United Scaffolding, Inc., No. 10-0526 Rusk State Hospital v. [read post]
5 Jun 2018, 4:11 am
The first was Hughes v. [read post]
