Search for: "L&N Property Group, Inc."
Results 261 - 280
of 329
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Nov 2009, 7:44 pm
LLC v Garmin Int’l, Inc (Chicago Intellectual Property Law Blog) District Court E D Texas: Motion for summary judgment as to patent defendant’s defences and counterclaims granted in p [read post]
8 Nov 2009, 7:44 pm
LLC v Garmin Int'l, Inc (Chicago Intellectual Property Law Blog) District Court E D Texas: Motion for summary judgment as to patent defendant's defences and counterclaims granted in part; antitrust claims severed: Fiber Systems International v Applied Optical Systems (EDTexweblog.com) District Court E D Texas: Motion to compel denied - non-compliance with 'meet and confer' rule: Konami Digital Entertainment Co v Harmonix Music (EDTexweblog.com) BPAI… [read post]
8 Nov 2009, 7:44 pm
: Imation v Koninklijke Philips Electronics (Patently-O) (IP Spotlight) District Court N D Illinois: Co [read post]
2 Nov 2009, 1:41 am
Group, Inc v Jungle Networks, Inc (Gray on Claims) BPAI holds term indefinite and summarizes reasoning behind broadest reasonable interpretation rule: Ex parte Senju Metal Industry Co (Gray on Claims) US Patents - Lawsuits and strategic steps Amkor Technology - ITC issues supplemental initial determination finding non-invalidity under 35 USC §§ 102(g) and 103(a) of certain asserted patent claims in investigation concerning Carsem's importation and sale of… [read post]
2 Nov 2009, 1:41 am
Group, Inc v Jungle Networks, Inc (Gray on Claims) BPAI holds term indefinite and summarizes reasoning behind broadest reasonable interpretation rule: Ex parte Senju Metal Industry Co (Gray on Claims) US Patents - Lawsuits and strategic steps Amkor Technology - ITC issues supplemental initial determination finding non-invalidity under 35 USC §§ 102(g) and 103(a) of certain asserted patent claims in investigation concerning Carsem's importation and sale of… [read post]
2 Nov 2009, 1:41 am
Group, Inc v Jungle Networks, Inc (Gray on Claims) BPAI holds term indefinite and summarizes reasoning behind broadest reasonable interpretation rule: Ex parte Senju Metal Industry Co (Gray on Claims) US Patents – Lawsuits and strategic steps Amkor Technology – ITC issues supplemental initial determination finding non-invalidity under 35 USC §§ 102(g) and 103(a) of certain asserted patent claims in investigation concerning… [read post]
26 Oct 2009, 6:25 am
Medico (Filewrapper) BPAI finds claim indefinite and not directed to patentable subject under Bilski: Ex parte Hemmat (GRAY On Claims) District Court N D Illinois: KSR obviousness does not require prior art from the same field: Se-Kure Controls, Inc v Diam USA, Inc (Chicago Intellectual Property Law Blog) District Court E D Texas finds plaintiff has standing; agreement transfers ownership and simultaneously a conditional purchase by transferor from transferee:… [read post]
26 Oct 2009, 5:25 am
Medico (Filewrapper) BPAI finds claim indefinite and not directed to patentable subject under Bilski: Ex parte Hemmat (GRAY On Claims) District Court N D Illinois: KSR obviousness does not require prior art from the same field: Se-Kure Controls, Inc v Diam USA, Inc (Chicago Intellectual Property Law Blog) District Court E D Texas finds plaintiff has standing; agreement transfers ownership and simultaneously a conditional purchase by transferor from transferee:… [read post]
26 Oct 2009, 5:25 am
Medico (Filewrapper) BPAI finds claim indefinite and not directed to patentable subject under Bilski: Ex parte Hemmat (GRAY On Claims) District Court N D Illinois: KSR obviousness does not require prior art from the same field: Se-Kure Controls, Inc v Diam USA, Inc (Chicago Intellectual Property Law Blog) District Court E D Texas finds plaintiff has standing; agreement transfers ownership and simultaneously a conditional purchase by transferor from transferee:… [read post]
23 Oct 2009, 10:00 am
" # # # Decided on October 22, 2009 No. 131 [*1]Amy L. [read post]
23 Oct 2009, 6:11 am
Int’l, Inc (Chicago Intellectual Property Law Blog) District Court E D Kentucky: Was this award for counsel fees ‘exceptional’ or less? [read post]
23 Oct 2009, 5:11 am
Int'l, Inc (Chicago Intellectual Property Law Blog) District Court E D Kentucky: Was this award for counsel fees 'exceptional' or less? [read post]
23 Oct 2009, 5:11 am
Int'l, Inc (Chicago Intellectual Property Law Blog) District Court E D Kentucky: Was this award for counsel fees 'exceptional' or less? [read post]
12 Oct 2009, 7:38 am
Many states have responded to this growing concern by enacting legislation restricting the association’s power to foreclose on property. [read post]
16 Sep 2009, 1:47 pm
(Salem, MA; Sonia Penta, President) B & H Properties Group, Inc. [read post]
16 Sep 2009, 1:47 am
Local No. 210, Laborers Int'l Union of N. [read post]
11 Sep 2009, 6:31 pm
See Russell L. [read post]
24 Aug 2009, 7:01 am
(Spicy IP) NUJS IP talk: Raj Gandesha on section 3(d) and incremental innovation (Spicy IP) Discussion of Business Standard article on Prof Carlos Correa’s displeasure at being misquoted by the Technical Expert Group (Spicy IP) Kenya Should Kenya merge its industrial property and copyright offices? [read post]
17 Aug 2009, 10:44 am
(N. [read post]
5 Aug 2009, 9:12 am
Cont’l Group Inc. v. [read post]
