Search for: "LASTER v LASTER"
Results 261 - 280
of 493
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 May 2011, 11:13 am
Laster v. [read post]
21 Feb 2018, 5:59 am
[3] and DFC Global Corporation v. [read post]
29 Jun 2021, 6:03 am
See Patterson v. [read post]
22 Jun 2015, 4:38 pm
See Henshaw v. [read post]
19 Nov 2017, 6:39 pm
In the recent decision of Wilkinson v. [read post]
22 Dec 2020, 2:29 pm
In his recent opinion in AB Stable VIII LLC v. [read post]
12 Jun 2012, 6:36 am
Delaware Applies Topping Bid Concept to Contested Settlement John Grossbauer of Potter Anderson notes: Recently, Delaware Vice Chancellor Laster delivered this opinion in Forsythe v. [read post]
18 Aug 2018, 9:27 pm
— A person may not advertise for sale merchandise, commodities, or service through an advertisement describing the merchandise, commodities, or service: (1) As part of a plan or scheme with the intent not to sell the merchandise, commodity, or service at the advertised price; or (2) With the intent not to sell the merchandise, commodity, or service.Typical Cases Laster v. [read post]
13 Sep 2010, 6:43 am
., Hampshire Group Ltd. v. [read post]
23 Jun 2024, 6:30 am
Background In Firefighters’ Pension System of the City of Kansas City, Missouri Trust v. [read post]
23 Jun 2024, 6:30 am
Background In Firefighters’ Pension System of the City of Kansas City, Missouri Trust v. [read post]
10 Jan 2008, 6:00 am
(C.D.Cal. 2005) 426 F.Supp.2d 1061, 1069 [housing rights center lost financial resources and diverted staff time investigating case against defendants]; Laster v. [read post]
8 Mar 2010, 8:01 am
In the litigation that followed, Vice Chancellor Laster had to determine: (1) the legality of a bylaw that reduced the size of an incumbent board; (2) the validity of the purchase of votes by Kurz under vote buying analysis; and (3) the consequence of the failure to obtain the omnibus proxy. [read post]
27 Jan 2015, 6:41 pm
Sinchareonkul v. [read post]
24 Aug 2015, 6:05 am
See Fox v. [read post]
16 May 2022, 3:18 am
In one of his subsequent opinions questioning the rule’s wisdom, Bamford v Penfold, L.P., VC Laster dropped an intriguing footnote referring to a “provocative article” published in 2010 by Professor of Law Lawrence Mitchell of The George Washington University entitled Gentleman’s Agreement: The Anti-Semitic Origins of Restrictions on Stockholder Litigation (available here). [read post]
23 Sep 2007, 11:25 pm
Laster, 2007 U.S. [read post]
26 Feb 2009, 10:26 am
Supreme Court (in T-Mobile v. [read post]
11 Aug 2009, 5:00 am
Laster came out of Richards Layton, a pro-management firm. [read post]
8 Mar 2017, 7:13 am
The Chancery Daily recently reported on the Court’s order in OSI Restaurant Partners, LLC v. [read post]
