Search for: "Land v. Marshall"
Results 261 - 280
of 559
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Oct 2016, 4:00 am
Marshall, Burwell v. [read post]
19 Oct 2016, 9:30 pm
New from the University Press of Kansas: The Great Yazoo Lands Sale: The Case of Fletcher v. [read post]
18 Oct 2016, 4:57 pm
L.L.C. v. [read post]
22 Sep 2016, 10:57 am
Under relevant sections of the Department of Transportation Act and the Federal-Aid to Highway Act, Justice Marshall noted, the Secretary was to approve highways running through park land only if there were no "prudent" alternative routes. [read post]
19 Sep 2016, 11:42 am
I've got "bear" in mind today, because I'm teaching District of Columbia v. [read post]
16 Sep 2016, 10:00 am
Marshall v. [read post]
13 Sep 2016, 8:13 am
The dissent was composed of the liberals on the Court: Harry Blackmun, William Brennan, and Thurgood Marshall. [read post]
6 Sep 2016, 11:23 am
(Citing Desmond v. [read post]
19 Aug 2016, 7:47 am
Prah v. [read post]
9 Aug 2016, 8:17 am
Like a schoolyard of packed gravel, they offer no comfortable place for the Supreme Court to land. [read post]
11 Jul 2016, 9:30 pm
In United States Army Corps of Engineers v. [read post]
14 Jun 2016, 5:15 am
In Puerto Rico v. [read post]
9 Jun 2016, 4:34 am
Himmelreich and Ross v. [read post]
2 Jun 2016, 4:24 am
From his perch on the highest bench in the land. [read post]
3 May 2016, 1:42 am
Marshall, 131 S. [read post]
23 Apr 2016, 7:50 am
* Looks like a competitor gamed the marshals with respect to the Hoverboard ex parte seizure at CES. [read post]
25 Mar 2016, 10:54 am
Marshall, of course, would become the paradigm-shifting fourth Chief Justice and author of the decision in Marbury v. [read post]
10 Mar 2016, 1:03 pm
” This new approach stemmed in part from significant public backlash against the Warren Court for its “highly unpopular crime-related decisions, notably Miranda v. [read post]
3 Mar 2016, 12:01 am
In Worcester v. [read post]
28 Feb 2016, 12:01 am
The case is most remarkable for its discussion of conquest, and for Marshall’s dicta pondering what it means for a “discoverer” to claim title to land already occupied by others. [read post]
