Search for: "Lanham v. State" Results 261 - 280 of 2,894
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Apr 2022, 6:30 am by Jack Becker
To finally “have the flat washboard abs and the sexy v-shape [they’ve] always wanted”? [read post]
23 Mar 2022, 8:26 am by Maribeth Meluch
The First Circuit addressed the reach of the Lanham Act in Cecil McBee v. [read post]
10 Mar 2022, 9:07 am by Venkat Balasubramani
False Association Under the Lanham Act: The court says plaintiffs state a claim under the Lanham Act: Taking [plaintiffs’] allegations as true, it follows that Tito & Tita represented it was associated with all the historic La Baguette content it failed to delete, associated with or endorsed by La Baguette as a successor, and endorsed by all La Baguette’s existing Facebook followers. [read post]
4 Mar 2022, 9:18 am by Eric Goldman
’” The examining attorney at the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) refused to register the proposed mark on the ground the phrase falsely suggests a connection with a person (here Donald Trump) in violation of Lanham Act Section 2(a), and also because this mark violates Section 2(c) of the Lanham Act. [read post]
28 Feb 2022, 4:19 am
" The CAFC noted that the Supreme Court has, in the past five years, held unconstitutional two portions of Section 2(a) of the Lanham Act: In Matal v. [read post]