Search for: "Law v. Wesley"
Results 261 - 280
of 462
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 May 2012, 4:56 am
This is offensive to many fans, who complain that football is by its nature a violent sport, that players are paid a lot of money to engage in the sport and that they should stop crying.The collective bargaining agreements that the players sign contain jurisdictional clauses for workers' compensation purposes to limit forum shopping so that players can not avail themselves of California law or other liberal work comp state laws.WorkCompCentral legal editor, Sherri Okamoto, this morning… [read post]
11 Apr 2012, 6:40 am
The Circuit eventually struck down the felony offender law in Besser v. [read post]
6 Apr 2012, 10:40 am
United States v. [read post]
29 Mar 2012, 4:47 am
Kelly v. [read post]
28 Mar 2012, 1:40 pm
Attorney Rodríguez-Vélez. [read post]
22 Mar 2012, 9:23 am
Widener University law professor Wesley M. [read post]
10 Feb 2012, 6:50 am
For further reading see Wesley E. [read post]
1 Feb 2012, 7:32 am
The law presumes that you will get that letter within 3 days, so the Court of Appeals (Cabranes, Miner and Wesley) assumes that plaintiff got it on November 27, 2010. [read post]
31 Jan 2012, 2:57 pm
The "Cheek" defense derives from a Supreme Court case, Cheek v. [read post]
19 Jan 2012, 6:51 am
In association with Bloomberg Law [read post]
15 Jan 2012, 7:44 am
Garcia v. [read post]
13 Jan 2012, 6:10 am
Mont.1999) (same); Wesley v. [read post]
4 Jan 2012, 12:37 pm
For old-law cases, like this one, the authority to impose post-imprisonment supervised release on a supervised release violation is governed by Johnson v. [read post]
20 Dec 2011, 5:32 pm
In Whitserve, LLC. v. [read post]
7 Dec 2011, 1:20 pm
(United States v. [read post]
3 Dec 2011, 10:28 am
Let’s call this the Wesley Snipes defense. [read post]
22 Nov 2011, 6:07 am
Kennedy Article first published online: 20 NOV 2011 | DOI: 10.1111/j.1745-9133.2011.00770.x Abstract Full Article (HTML) PDF(79K) References Too big to fail : The science and politics of violence prevention (pages 1053–1061) Andrew V. [read post]
15 Nov 2011, 6:00 am
The Court of Appeals holds that a Vermont woman who suffered retaliation after speaking to the newspaper and testifying before a public board about job-related matters does not have a claim under the First Amendment because her speech was not protected under the Supreme Court's Garcetti decision, which holds that speech is unprotected if the plaintiff made it pursuant to her official job duties.The case is Bearss v. [read post]
28 Oct 2011, 6:54 am
In association with Bloomberg Law [read post]
25 Oct 2011, 6:37 am
Wesley Oliver – United States v. [read post]
