Search for: "Legall v. State" Results 261 - 280 of 87,882
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Nov 2023, 6:44 pm by Howard Bashman
Jarkesy could vindicate a legal protection against the administrative state that the Founders fought for” appeared first on How Appealing. [read post]
5 Jun 2009, 4:41 am
Legal Aid Soc, Inc., 95 N.Y.2d 443, 447, 741 N.E.2d 109, 718 N.Y.S.2d 264 (2000); Carmel v. [read post]
28 Dec 2021, 11:44 am by Associated Press
State legislatures will be responding to the possibility of seismic change to the 1973 Roe v. [read post]
22 Apr 2007, 9:29 am
Whether a legal duty exists is a question of law, to be decided by the court. [read post]
28 Nov 2011, 6:59 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
It is undisputed that the defendants failed to submit such "documentary evidence" when they filed the underlying claim in the Court of Claims and that the underlying claim was dismissed based on that pleading defect (Reed v State of New York, [*2]78 NY2d 1, 7; Gioeli v State of New York, 39 AD3d 815; Piccarreto v State of New York, 144 AD2d 920, 921; Heiss v State of New York, 143 AD2d 67, 69; Ivey v… [read post]
Background Last week the Supreme Court handed down judgment in R (T) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2014] UKSC 35. [read post]
31 Jan 2013, 4:32 pm by Reproductive Rights
The Washington Post - Wonkblog: All states except Oregon now limit abortion access, by Sarah Kliff: Roe v. [read post]
22 Jan 2013, 4:29 pm by Mary Whisner
Abortion, Legal -- history -- United States. [read post]
18 Mar 2021, 9:34 am by Eric Goldman
Plotkin did not agree, citing the legal principle that governments cannot ban anonymous political campaigning. [read post]
27 Sep 2011, 10:26 am by immigrationprof
§ 1101(a)(13)(C)(v), which divests a legal permanent resident of his right, under Rosenberg v. [read post]
24 Dec 2022, 5:46 pm by Howard Bashman
“In States Where Abortion Is Legal, Some Cities Look to Restrict Access; Local measures highlight complexity of abortion access in states after Supreme Court’s decision to overturn Roe v. [read post]