Search for: "Liable Defendant(s)" Results 261 - 280 of 20,989
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Aug 2011, 6:54 am by Mike Scarcella
An assistant federal public defender helped Singletary petition a Washington federal trial judge. [read post]
1 Apr 2019, 11:52 am by Steven M. Sweat
B289766, some defendants may not be vicariously liable for the actions of chapters that are run independently. [read post]
25 May 2018, 6:06 am by dhdlaw
  In some cases, however, the potentially liable defendant may attempt to avoid civil liability by remaining unresponsive to your legal complaint against them, or by failing to appear for a court hearing. [read post]
1 Feb 2019, 9:35 am by Burton A. Padove
Yeakle’s Sports Bar and Grill, which created a separate test for “duty of care” by defendants compared to “proximate cause” of the injury). [read post]
20 Aug 2018, 5:39 am by David J. Halberg, Esq.
A golf club may be liable for a near-fatal wasp attack suffered by a patron in California, where an appellate court reversed a summary judgment in the golf club’s favor. [read post]
27 Apr 2021, 12:50 pm by Alex Lee
Factual Background: An Employer Rescinds an Oral Job Offer to an Investment Advisor Plaintiff Jed Goldfarb, who had previously worked as a financial research analyst, alleged that following several conversations with defendant David Solimine, Solimine offered him a job managing his family’s sizable investment portfolio. [read post]
27 Jul 2021, 8:00 am by Dietrich Law Firm P.C.
Continue reading The post Implications Of A Defendants Bankruptcy On A Personal Injury Judgment appeared first on Buffalo Personal Injury Lawyer News. [read post]
14 May 2018, 8:32 am
Who's responsible for making this video available: (a) the user-uploader(b) YouTube(c) both of them(d) Merpel(e) no oneCan YouTube be considered primarily responsible (and, therefore, potentially liable) for the making available of user-uploaded content through its platform? [read post]
7 Sep 2022, 3:10 pm by Natalie Kirby
Explaining Automaker Liability for Unnecessarily Dangerous Roofs In most areas of the law, a defendant is only liable if they act with some degree of irresponsibility or malice. [read post]
30 Apr 2019, 9:05 am by Benjamin S. Persons, IV
As the parent, are you liable for any damages arising from a personal injury lawsuit brought by the other driver? [read post]
29 Jul 2010, 4:35 pm by Harry Styron
Unless the defendant could prove that he exercised reasonable care, he could be liable, and the plaintiff would not have to address the issue of the defendants negligence. [read post]
17 Mar 2022, 9:09 am by Allison Gomez
  A jury verdict in favor of the plaintiff means that the defendant is legally liable for the plaintiff’s damages. [read post]
24 Oct 2014, 10:53 am by Benjamin S. Persons, IV
The defendants argued they could not be held liable, since it was the “intervening act” of a third party—the vehicle that rear-ended the plaintiff’s car and forced it into the tractor’s lane—that led to the accident. [read post]
18 Feb 2018, 1:36 pm by Tilem & Associates
Finding that the defendants mere presence at the scene of gang meet-ups was insufficient to establish a conspiracy to commit a crime, the court reversed the defendants conviction. [read post]
13 Feb 2014, 12:20 pm
The defendant remains hospitalized but held on $6 million bail. [read post]
7 Jul 2016, 1:29 pm by Law Offices of Jeffrey S. Glassman
Some defendants in asbestos litigation, facing crippling debt in the face of accountability for concealing the danger of their products and failing to protect the public, filed for bankruptcy and established trusts to pay out current and future claims. [read post]
23 Sep 2010, 8:31 am
 If Yonker had joined Slovin under Rule 14, making Slovin “third-party defendants,” such joinder would only be proper if Slovin was liable to Yonker for all or part of Liberty’s claim against Yonker. [read post]
6 Oct 2009, 7:52 am
      The driver’s employer and/or the parent company: Employers can be held vicariously liable for the actions of their employees under the doctrine of respondeat superior. 5. [read post]