Search for: "Like v. Pierce" Results 261 - 280 of 914
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Nov 2019, 3:55 am by Edith Roberts
Briefly: For The New York Times, Kristin Hussey and Elizabeth Williamson report that the court “will consider this week whether to hear a case seeking to pierce firearm manufacturers’ legal immunity in the aftermath of shootings,” Remington Arms Co. v. [read post]
14 May 2022, 9:31 am by Mavrick Law Firm
For example, a sufficient, legitimate, non-discriminatory reason for the employer to not hire the plaintiff applicant for a sales clerk or wait staff position may be that the employer did not like the plaintiff’s “appearance because his hair was uncombed and he had dandruff all over his shoulders,” “because he had his nose pierced,” or “because his fingernails were dirty. [read post]
4 Apr 2016, 10:37 am
The revolution in personal jurisdiction touched off by Daimler AG v. [read post]
9 Apr 2008, 12:00 am
In what could be considered the first major judicial opinion on workplace bullying, the Indiana Supreme Court, in Raess v. [read post]
7 May 2017, 9:30 pm by Richard J. Pierce, Jr.
The Supreme Court put a halt to that absurd practice in its opinion in United States v. [read post]
15 Nov 2016, 7:23 am by Juan C. Antúnez
Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner, & Smith, Inc., 292 F.3d 1334, 1339 (11th Cir. 2002), abrogated on other grounds by Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. v. [read post]
22 Nov 2023, 6:30 am by ernst
Proof of such conduct would likely be a full-blown scandal. [read post]
18 Sep 2020, 1:10 am by Michael Douglas
Their business models have been undercut by ‘digital platforms’ like Facebook and Google. [read post]
17 Feb 2014, 12:12 pm
Marshall (2006) case (which I observed as a clerk) and the Stern v. [read post]
15 Nov 2016, 7:23 am by Juan C. Antúnez
Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner, & Smith, Inc., 292 F.3d 1334, 1339 (11th Cir. 2002), abrogated on other grounds by Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. v. [read post]
11 Feb 2010, 1:05 pm by Miriam Cherry
Apart from discussing the critical corporate attributes yesterday, we also discussed the famous veil-piercing case, Walkovszky v. [read post]