Search for: "Lite v. State"
Results 261 - 280
of 312
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Jul 2013, 12:12 pm
” However, both of these exemptions require that the fund securities must be offered and sold without any marketing to the public in the United States. [read post]
23 Mar 2015, 3:32 am
Such relief is rarely granted under New York law, where, as in the case at bar, the movant would be receiving the ultimate relief pendente lite and could ultimately be compensated through monetary damages, Rosa Hair Stylists Inc. v Jaber Food Corp., 218 AD2d 793 (2d Dep’t 1995); see Matos v City of New York, 21 AD3d 936 (2d Dep’t 2005); Neos v Lacey, 291 AD2d 434 (2d Dep’t 2002). [read post]
23 Dec 2011, 6:56 am
The December 14, 2011 Court of Appeals opinion in Roof v. [read post]
31 Aug 2007, 12:53 am
Supreme Court vacated the 2nd Circuit's ruling and instructed it to reconsider in light of its decision in Carey v. [read post]
1 Feb 2007, 8:48 pm
(TTABlogged here).In re Truck-Lite Co., Serial No. 76532510 (January 26, 2006). [read post]
18 Sep 2023, 6:47 am
Inc. v. [read post]
11 Mar 2012, 4:27 am
” There's a chance this may change with the Supreme Court's consideration of an Arizona case, Martinez v. [read post]
1 Jan 2018, 4:05 pm
Advocate General Szpunar gave an Opinion in Asociación Profesional Élite Taxi v Uber Systems Spain, C-434/15 on 11 May 2017 and in Uber France SAS, Case C‑320/16 on 4 July 2017. [read post]
17 Sep 2018, 6:10 am
Such written agreement must state that it will be the responsibility of the adoptive parent(s) to inform the appropriate State or local official when they are no longer legally responsible for the child or no longer providing any support to the child” (18 NYCRR 421.24[c][5]). [read post]
17 Sep 2018, 6:10 am
Such written agreement must state that it will be the responsibility of the adoptive parent(s) to inform the appropriate State or local official when they are no longer legally responsible for the child or no longer providing any support to the child” (18 NYCRR 421.24[c][5]). [read post]
16 Nov 2011, 11:08 am
In any event, the Appellate Division stated that his contention was without merit because the father's income for the purpose of calculating his child support obligation includes imputed income (Family Ct Act 413[1][b][5][iv], [v] ), and thus his income was above the federal poverty income guidelines (see generally s 413[1][g]; Matter of Julianska v. [read post]
24 Feb 2007, 11:48 pm
If a student writes on an exam at a state school that the First Amendment doesn't apply to the states, the student gets a bad grade. [read post]
7 Aug 2018, 4:42 am
In the US, there is still strong animosity against those who did not support Hilary, and the Bernie v Hilary split is still dividing opinion. [read post]
3 Jun 2022, 9:44 am
Snyder v. [read post]
25 Feb 2020, 7:47 am
” Yesterday, in a reported (precedent setting) opinion in the case of S.W. v. [read post]
15 May 2016, 4:20 pm
We draw attention to the following: The UK might use legislative flexibility to enact something that could be described as “GDPR lite” according to The Register. [read post]
7 Apr 2007, 6:24 am
joint v. sole? [read post]
18 Oct 2007, 3:48 pm
joint v. sole? [read post]
4 Apr 2024, 1:50 pm
Vichy did not seek relief pendent lite to enjoin construction of the Project. [read post]
23 Sep 2011, 5:21 am
Defendant stated that the discovery he sought was relevant to the issue whether plaintiff's actions caused appreciation to the separate property which should then be included in the marital estate. [read post]
