Search for: "Litman v. Litman" Results 261 - 280 of 330
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Feb 2014, 2:48 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Session 2: The Product Market DimensionRobert Burrell: why do we treat territorial and product markets so differently? [read post]
28 Feb 2014, 10:06 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  So we have exhaustion in theory but in practice a retailer can prevent it.Dorpan v. [read post]
21 May 2013, 12:33 pm
Litman The decision in Mayo Collaborative Services, DBA Mayo Medical Laboratories, et al. v. [read post]
13 Apr 2013, 7:51 am by Rebecca Tushnet
(Litman says you can’t get the case file that far back.) [read post]
12 Apr 2013, 1:56 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Litman: Private market registry story is a little too simple. [read post]
12 Apr 2013, 9:14 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  How much do we trust courts v. signals from the PTO? [read post]
12 Apr 2013, 9:13 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Playing with reality v. paper rights to compromise reflecting different systems. [read post]
8 Apr 2013, 6:47 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Last week’s arguments in US v. [read post]
4 Apr 2013, 12:10 pm by hls
Jonathan Litman- requires pro bono service prior to the bar makes life difficult for students but is a good policy ; California takes lead on Civil Gideon. 10:53- 3 good  arguments for expanding civil gideon:  1) we will all save money if other people get counsel 2) protecting rule of law is good for business and consumers 3) strengthen our own best selves. 10:54- Justice is JUST – US 10:55- Panel 1: Russell Engler, Rebecca Sandefur, Mark Ladov, and… [read post]
29 Mar 2013, 3:38 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
  Jessica Litman’s Digital Copyright (link to PDF) demonstrates the stakeholder politics of copyright law. [read post]
23 Oct 2012, 8:08 am by Terry Hart
In the 1932 Supreme Court case Fox Film Corp. v. [read post]
23 Oct 2012, 8:08 am by Terry Hart
In the 1932 Supreme Court case Fox Film Corp. v. [read post]
28 Aug 2012, 1:03 pm by Sarah Cole
Thereafter, the Third Circuit issued a precedential opinion in Litman v. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 12:15 pm by dirklasater
These processes and are currently being utilized on a grand scale by groups referred to as “copyright trolls” (“troll”).v Unlike the prototypical ‘content owners versus file sharer’ battle that has heretofore been pursued, this revived model brings a new third party to the bargaining table. [read post]
4 May 2012, 2:54 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
In Reisner v Litman & Litman, P.C. 2012 NY Slip Op 03428   Decided on May 1, 2012   The Appellate Division, Second Department  reverses and issues a blanket finding that neither the County nor the Contractor "could" have been liable. [read post]
23 Apr 2012, 5:36 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  Had different instincts about copyrightable works created as logos v. use of Snoopy, created for other purposes, then transferred into TM by licensing. [read post]