Search for: "Lively v. Commissioner of Social Security"
Results 261 - 280
of 311
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 May 2012, 5:17 am
Commissioner No. 2005-57, the Special Trial Judge held section 86(d)(3) of the Tax Code states that an injured worker is required to pay income tax on the amount of a workers' compensation benefits offset from social security disability benefits. [read post]
17 May 2012, 10:42 am
It was an integral part of the move to combine tax allowances and social security benefits into a seamless tax credit system [30]. [read post]
4 May 2012, 6:17 pm
Commissioner of Social Security, the U.S. [read post]
29 Mar 2012, 9:52 am
Department of Homeland Security, Diallo v. [read post]
20 Mar 2012, 12:05 am
We are as powerfully driven by notions of rank and conformity as we were when we lived in small hunter gatherer groups. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 5:50 am
The Tabloid Watch blog reports on a costume business owner’s complaint with a Daily Mail article which alleged she lived “her modern life dressed as her heroine Charlotte Bronte“. [read post]
15 Feb 2012, 12:12 pm
As recently noted by the Environmental Commissioner of Ontario, the core business of these two ministries has become much more complex since their inception. [read post]
6 Jan 2012, 2:00 am
Remember you and your health insurance company fired her and (I’ll assume) she no longer has health insurance so we need a mechanism to make you guys own up to the problems you’re causing Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid. [read post]
5 Jan 2012, 5:35 pm
Commissioner of Social Security, the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeal once again explains just how important a treating physician's - or psychologist's - opinion is in proving a Social Security disability claim. [read post]
Media Law Review of the Year 2011: Defamation, Contempt, Privacy and a Public Inquiry – Jude Townend
29 Dec 2011, 4:54 pm
” June 2011 A libel claim brought by a social worker involved in the “Baby P” case, Sylvia Henry v News Group Newspapers, settled before reaching trial. [read post]
23 Dec 2011, 6:19 am
Board of Education), has tried to enable localized immigrant bashing, and has proposed crazy attacks on the federal income tax and the Social Security system. [read post]
21 Dec 2011, 7:12 pm
Commissioner of Social Security, the District Court for the District of New Jersey explains how this analysis should be carried out. [read post]
13 Dec 2011, 6:52 pm
Plaintiff Sharon Lomax, a 43-year-old who lives on Long Island, filed a claim with the Social Security Administration (SSA) seeking Social Security Disability Insurance and Supplemental Security Income benefits. [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 9:17 am
The consequence of this information asymmetry was the growth of government services and poor living conditions. [read post]
6 Dec 2011, 5:54 am
See Handschu v. [read post]
17 Sep 2011, 4:07 am
AstrueCourt: U.S. 10th Circuit Court of Appeals Docket: 10-5155 September 8, 2011 Judge: Briscoe Areas of Law: Government & Administrative Law, Public Benefits Petitioner Becky Jean Willig appealed an opinion and order entered by a United States Magistrate Judge that affirmed the decision of the Commissioner of Social Security (Commissioner) denying her application for supplemental security income benefits. [read post]
15 Sep 2011, 3:43 am
Voyias v Information Commissioner and the London Borough of Camden EA/2011/0007 – Read Judgment The First Tier Tribunal has overturned a decision of the Information Commissioner and ordered Camden Council to provide information about empty properties in the borough to a former member of the Advisory Service for Squatters. [read post]
4 Sep 2011, 7:15 am
http://j.st/Smf Golden Living Ctr. [read post]
4 Sep 2011, 7:15 am
http://j.st/Smf Golden Living Ctr. [read post]
31 Aug 2011, 3:26 am
The Court of Appeals held that that the irrebuttable presumption mandating that an indigent, non-custodial parent be ordered to pay a minimum of $25 per month in child support contravened the Federal Child Support Enforcement Act Social Security Act, Title IV-D §467(b)(2), as amended, 42 USCA §667(b)(2), thus violating the constitutional principle of Federal preemption. [read post]
