Search for: "Lloyds of London" Results 261 - 280 of 982
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Mar 2024, 4:18 am by Patrick Bracher (ZA)
[Frantic, Inc. v Certain Underwriters at Lloyd’s of London case number B326222, in the Court of Appeal in the State of California, Second Appellate District (18 March 2024)] [read post]
15 Nov 2010, 5:02 am
Underwriters At Lloyd's London (4th Dept., decided 11/12/2010) If an insured's attorney grants and then terminates an indefinite extension for a defendant insurer to answer the insured's complaint, but no answer is forthcoming and the action lies dormant for two years, what happens? [read post]
While the Lloyd’s of London insurers had agreed to pay Anadarko $37.5 million for damages, they declined to cover $100 million-plus in defense fees, arguing that both Anadarko’s liability and defense expenses are subject to the $37.5 million joint venture limit for “liability” insured. [read post]
23 May 2008, 8:12 am
PROFESSIONAL LIABILITY - RESCISSION - DECLARATORY JUDGMENT RELIEF - DEFAULT JUDGMENTCertain Underwriters at Lloyd's of London v. [read post]
20 Sep 2016, 4:35 am by Rose Walker, staff
Pair advise alongside Travers Smith as Canada Pension Plan Investment makes insurance push with Ascot deal [read post]
In the 18th Century, underwriting desks at what came to be known as Lloyd’s of London were developed to share or transfer risks associated with shipping.[1] Availability of risk sharing, or insurance, provided protection for maritime investors and facilitated increased levels of investment and thus increased levels of maritime activity. [read post]
6 Aug 2019, 8:37 am by Steven Cohen
Facts:  This case (Certain Underwriters at Lloyd’s, London v. [read post]
29 Sep 2009, 5:00 am
., insurers at Lloyd's of London and several other companies at least $100 million in claims. [read post]
15 Jul 2019, 8:05 am by Jordan M. Asch
” The Court held that Lloyd’s of London Underwriters (“Lloyd’s”) were liable to cover approximately $112 million as a result of policy language that the Court interpreted as distinguishing between “liability” and “expenses. [read post]
14 Oct 2011, 10:57 am by Luke Gilman
His obituary in the Washington Post told of his high-profile client list, about whom he rarely spoke, and his equally high-profile corporate clients, such as Lloyds of London. [read post]
18 Feb 2010, 6:41 pm by Juan Antunez
In the linked-to opinion the unsecured probate creditor -  UK insurance giant Lloyd's of London - cried foul when the debtor's son strategically waited two years and one day! [read post]
22 Sep 2016, 11:58 am by Sandra Sithole
(Certain Underwriters of Lloyds v National Railroad Passenger Corporation et al) [read post]