Search for: "Long v. Arnold"
Results 261 - 280
of 603
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Apr 2016, 1:00 am
The case of England And Wales Cricket Board Ltd v Tixdaq Ltd dealt with an app called Fanatix, which, among providing sports news, allowed for its users to record clips (up to 8 seconds long) using their smartphones or tablets, and sharing them with like-minded sports fans who might not be able to follow the action live (encapsulating mostly the 'highlights' of an event). [read post]
5 Apr 2016, 6:32 am
Mr Justice Arnold has not. [read post]
3 Apr 2016, 12:30 am
Williams discusses Defenders of the Unborn: The Pro-Life Movement Before Roe v. [read post]
28 Mar 2016, 9:23 am
The AmeriKat's copy of Sir Robin's bookNot many books start with "Richard Arnold said... [read post]
20 Mar 2016, 5:12 am
We now may have a partial answer in the case of England And Wales Cricket Board Ltd v Tixdaq Ltd. [read post]
16 Mar 2016, 8:14 am
Heller and McDonald v. [read post]
14 Mar 2016, 3:23 am
It's about the long-running litigation over the (in)famous Louboutin red soles. [read post]
13 Mar 2016, 6:01 am
Even more so, when the email attaches a judgment that is short and easily digestible, as was the case in Mr Justice Arnold's decision in Napp v Dr Reddy's and Sandoz [2016] EWHC 493. [read post]
9 Mar 2016, 9:08 am
Harris v. [read post]
9 Mar 2016, 7:17 am
This morning Lord Neuberger handed down the judgment of the UK Supreme Court in the Trunki case, PMS International Limited v Magmatic Limited [2016] UKSC 12. [read post]
7 Mar 2016, 1:55 am
Hoffmann-La Roche AG and Genentech Inc. | Design v Copyright in Italy | Unitary patent and double patenting | Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc v Kymab Ltd & Anor | IKEA in Indonesia | Eli Lilly v Janssen Sciences.Never too late 83 [week ending on Sunday 14 February] – Indigenous IP | Arnold J's latest judgment flags down the iconic London black cab | Life of a national/EU trade mark ... in a map | A comprehensive… [read post]
6 Mar 2016, 1:01 pm
The judgment sets out the relevant extracts from the key authority Ridehalgh v Horsefield, and Watson v Watson [1994] 2 FLR 194. [read post]
25 Feb 2016, 7:02 am
Not long after argument, my client died (prior to his appeal being decided). [read post]
25 Feb 2016, 7:02 am
Not long after argument, my client died (prior to his appeal being decided). [read post]
12 Feb 2016, 7:59 pm
Read with a plummy Joanna Lumley voice, Mr Arnold's decision in Actavis v Lilly [2016] EWHC 234 may be just the thing to set the mood for a romantic candlelight dinner (although, some may say it is a mood killer depending what side you are on). [read post]
9 Feb 2016, 6:07 am
This was just one of the many questions dealt with by Mr Justice Arnold in The London Taxi Corporation Limited trading as the London Taxi Company v (1) Frazer-Nash Research Limited and (2) Ecotive Limited [2016] EWHC 52 (Ch). [read post]
1 Feb 2016, 11:48 am
.* Storm in a C Cup: Mr Justice Carr refuses injunction and account of profits in Stretchline v H&M spatElettra Bietti (A&O) summarises for the Kat-readership the recent and unreported decision of Mr Justice Carr in the on-going Stretchline v H&M dispute [see previous posts here], which serves as a warning for all those who draft IP settlement agreements in the event of future infringements.* Pharmaceuticals, Fig Leaves and Accidental Overspill: the… [read post]
22 Jan 2016, 10:37 am
As you probably know, on Wednesday, the Supreme Court finally issued its long-awaited opinion in Campbell-Ewald Co. v. [read post]
15 Jan 2016, 5:49 am
It was most likely some classic tort or contract case (see Carlill v Carbolic Smoke Bomb or Caparo v Dickman). [read post]
14 Jan 2016, 8:00 am
” Similarly, in Arnold v. [read post]
