Search for: "Long v. Clark"
Results 261 - 280
of 1,357
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Feb 2020, 7:53 am
The federal plea-bargaining system, we believe, is long out of control and in need of serious reform. [read post]
16 Jan 2020, 3:20 pm
See Olenik v. [read post]
13 Jan 2020, 9:41 am
Clarke, 944 F.3d 243 (Dec. 6, 2019). [read post]
6 Jan 2020, 3:13 pm
(Keeton v. [read post]
26 Dec 2019, 6:20 am
Roberts, The Case for Restitution and Unjust Enrichment Remedies in Patent Law, 14 Lewis & Clark L. [read post]
19 Dec 2019, 4:11 pm
Instead, in Murphy v Callinan [2018] IESC 59 (30 November 2018) Baker J (Clarke CJ and Dunne J concurring) approved and applied Collins. [read post]
18 Dec 2019, 4:08 pm
And, in Murphy v Callinan [2018] IESC 59 (30 November 2018) [36]-[44], Baker J (Clarke CJ and Dunne J concurring) in the Supreme Court approved Feeney J’s analysis in Collins (I will return to this case in a future post). [read post]
17 Dec 2019, 12:15 pm
” In Brown, and then emphatically in Loving v. [read post]
13 Dec 2019, 1:28 am
Jeremy Clarke-Williams, partner, and Nilly Tabatabai, trainee solicitor, Penningtons Manches Cooper This article was first published in New Law Journal on 6/12/19 and is reproduced with kind permission [read post]
12 Dec 2019, 5:44 am
State of Texas v. [read post]
29 Nov 2019, 9:05 pm
Silliker Lecturer is selected by a committee including a representative from Merieux NutriSciences, the Program Committee Chairperson, and the IAFP President.2019 Recipient: Robert V. [read post]
18 Nov 2019, 8:12 am
LLC. v. [read post]
29 Oct 2019, 10:00 pm
The copyrightability of clothing and other useful articles had long been an issue without much direction, however, in Star Athletica, L.L.C. v. [read post]
6 Oct 2019, 3:37 am
Lewis & Clark Marine, Inc., 531 U. [read post]
30 Sep 2019, 2:22 pm
State v. [read post]
30 Sep 2019, 2:22 pm
State v. [read post]
30 Sep 2019, 2:22 pm
State v. [read post]
25 Sep 2019, 4:25 am
Long Island R.R. [read post]
18 Sep 2019, 2:07 pm
His Honour Judge Hacon has referred to the CJEU two important questions of unregistered Community design (UCD) law.In Beverly Hills Teddy Bear Company v PMS International Group plc [2019] EWHC 2419 (IPEC), the Claimant (BHTB) seeks to enforce its registered Community designs, UCDs and copyright in design drawings in six soft toys called “Squeezamals” [which are seemingly very popular; readers with small children may be better placed to comment]. [read post]
