Search for: "Long v. District Court" Results 261 - 280 of 22,255
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Mar 2024, 7:37 am by Amy Howe
Under the Supreme Court’s 2019 decision in Nieves v. [read post]
21 Mar 2024, 5:02 am by Beatrice Yahia
Sahil Kapur and Frank Thorp V report for NBC News. [read post]
20 Mar 2024, 4:23 pm by Dennis Crouch
The district court particularly relied on the Federal Circuit’s prior decision in ActiveVideo Networks, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Mar 2024, 11:24 am by Richard Hunt
” Those are, of course cases from the Fifth Circuit and Supreme Court; not the district court cases holding in Bowman’s favor. [read post]
20 Mar 2024, 9:28 am by Andrew Weissmann
Editor’s note: This article may be updated as new court filings are published before the hearing. [read post]
19 Mar 2024, 2:10 pm by Josh Blackman
The District Court entered preliminary injunction to block the law from going into effect. [read post]
19 Mar 2024, 2:04 pm by vforberger
Last week, the Wisconsin Supreme Court issued its decision in Catholic Charities v. [read post]
19 Mar 2024, 9:48 am by Amy Howe
In her brief on the merits, Gonzalez contends that instead of Nieves, the court of appeals should have applied the court’s 1977 decision in Mount Healthy City School District Board of Education v. [read post]
19 Mar 2024, 5:37 am by Unknown
A lottery will be held soon to determine which appeals court will hear the various petitions against the rule (Liberty Energy, Incorporated v. [read post]
19 Mar 2024, 3:01 am by jonathanturley
In 2008, the District of Columbia brought us District of Columbia v. [read post]
18 Mar 2024, 9:30 am by Guest Blogger
The movement has advanced claims to revive enforcement of this 1873 federal obscenity law—whose long-unenforced provisions cover abortion-related articles—in courts and in the presidential campaign. [read post]
17 Mar 2024, 8:11 pm by Sabrina I. Pacifici
Here, we want to identify a few critical issues that the publishers focus on in their brief, including some questionable fair use analysis that they repeat from the district court below. [read post]