Search for: "Long v. Hooks"
Results 261 - 280
of 845
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Aug 2022, 5:01 am
U.S. v. [read post]
2 Feb 2023, 3:37 pm
Canceling a Patent Claim February 1, 2023 | Dennis Crouch “The pending case of Jump Rope Systems v. [read post]
15 Apr 2020, 3:09 pm
Additional Resources: Ducksworth v. [read post]
16 Dec 2011, 11:02 am
Hooks, decided earlier this year: I reluctantly concur, based on the Texas Supreme Court's holding in BP America Production Co. v. [read post]
1 Aug 2017, 12:24 pm
In the recent case (Schoenhalz v. [read post]
11 Mar 2010, 9:56 am
An interesting, but unsurprising, decision in Todd v. [read post]
Celanese v. ITC: Can a Secret Manufacturing Process Be Patented After Sale of the Resulting Product?
4 Mar 2024, 9:45 am
Auld Company v. [read post]
11 Nov 2019, 6:30 am
It’s about the long struggle over the scope of national power. [read post]
10 Feb 2009, 9:48 pm
The problem, however, is that this jurisdictional hook still creates a class that is too broad for Commerce Clause purposes. [read post]
11 Sep 2013, 10:51 am
It doesnt (sic) matter who is getting killed as long as there is killing. [read post]
8 Aug 2017, 12:10 pm
| the EU IPO Observatory study finds trade secrets rule the roost over patents in Europe | Mock (culinary) trial at INTA 2017| Weetabix in New Zealand Customs dispute over local rival Weet-Bix Never Too Late 155 [week ending Sunday 9 July] First application of the parody exception in Canadian law - long live Deckmyn! [read post]
21 Jul 2017, 3:14 am
The milk shall judge.Weekly Roundups: Sunday SurprisesImage credits: Cecilia Sbrolli PREVIOUSLY ON NEVER TOO LATENever Too Late 155 [week ending Sunday 9 July] First application of the parody exception in Canadian law - long live Deckmyn! [read post]
15 Jul 2017, 5:11 am
As always, the IPKat is here to bring you a quick summary -the 155th edition of Never Too Late.When the court just doesn't get your humourFirst application of the parody exception in Canadian law - long live Deckmyn! [read post]
19 Jan 2011, 9:38 am
Van Hook, 558 U. [read post]
13 Jan 2009, 2:19 am
On January 8, the SJC heard oral argument in the matter of Boston Gas Co. v. [read post]
19 Sep 2012, 5:17 pm
Richardson, K5277 .T47 2009 v. 1 and v. 2 at Classified Stacks, publisher's page What's that? [read post]
23 Mar 2010, 10:30 am
According to the ECJ, this means that Google is off the hook if it can show that its storage of data as AdWords is "merely technical, automatic, and passive," indicating that the company lacks knowledge of or control over the particular terms stored by advertisers. [read post]
13 Jan 2011, 5:22 am
This case, she suggested, has a much stronger jurisdictional hook to the United States. [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 4:15 pm
The conservative justices just don’t seem to be biting on the “health care is special” hook. [read post]
17 Apr 2013, 5:18 am
She said the images had a `fingerprint,’ meaning “basically a number, but it's a very long number and it's a unique fingerprint to that hard drive. [read post]
