Search for: "Long v. US Dept. of Justice"
Results 261 - 280
of 346
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Jan 2012, 3:00 am
If there's anything worse than failing to specify standards for the alternative valuation, it's providing no alternative, as when the buy-sell mandates use of the stale fixed price, which brings us to this week's featured case, DeMatteo v. [read post]
28 Mar 2022, 3:44 am
Manhattan Commercial Division Justice Joel M. [read post]
23 Aug 2010, 6:00 am
" See C and J Leasing Corp. v. [read post]
10 Jun 2013, 8:31 am
This branch of public lawyers have the opportunity for an extensive career in the criminal law and are afforded a great level of discretion in our liberal criminal justice system. [read post]
10 Jun 2013, 8:31 am
This branch of public lawyers have the opportunity for an extensive career in the criminal law and are afforded a great level of discretion in our liberal criminal justice system. [read post]
21 Apr 2014, 4:07 am
If he gets caught in a lie on something that’s material at trial his future use to anyone is useless, correct? [read post]
5 Jul 2018, 5:00 am
We turn next to that use. [read post]
5 Jul 2018, 5:00 am
We turn next to that use. [read post]
20 Feb 2017, 3:33 am
The appellate panel’s unanimous decision in Matter of Gould Erectors & Rigging, Inc., 146 AD3d 1128, 2017 NY Slip Op 00228 [3d Dept Jan. 12, 2017], affirmed in every respect Albany County Commercial Division Justice Richard M. [read post]
14 Aug 2016, 1:00 pm
As discussed below, the Division encourages the industry to use the n [read post]
9 Sep 2008, 2:14 pm
Alaska Dept. of Edu. [read post]
17 Jul 2017, 4:44 pm
California Dept. of Fish & Wildlife (2015) 62 Cal.4th 204, 219-220. [read post]
23 May 2015, 9:00 pm
., Petitioner, v. [read post]
19 Feb 2024, 3:00 am
State v. [read post]
30 Sep 2022, 12:30 pm
Ninth Circuit (en banc): Have you read McCulloch v. [read post]
14 Apr 2014, 3:04 am
A Manhattan appellate panel’s decision last month in Akasa Holdings, LLC v Sweet, 2014 NY Slip Op 01822 [1st Dept Mar. 20, 2014], illustrates another kind of co-op shareholder dispute involving a battle for board control of a four-unit co-op, pitting one tenant-shareholder owning a majority of the voting shares against the other three tenant-shareholders. [read post]
2 Sep 2010, 5:01 am
” See C and J Leasing Corp. v. [read post]
23 Apr 2012, 6:04 am
Justices Freedman and Manzanet-Daniels dissented in part in separate memoranda. [read post]
10 Oct 2016, 3:34 am
The Report rejected any surcharge for the decedent’s use and occupancy of the building’s top two floors based primarily on the long history of the family’s rent-free use going back to the 1940’s. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 2:13 pm
Jeffries Homes Housing Project, 306 Mich 638, 647-48; 11 NW2d 272 (1943); Grand Rapids Bd of Ed v Baczewski, 340 Mich 265, 270-71; 65 NW2d 810 (1954); Dep’t of Conservation v Connor, 316 Mich 565, 576-78; 25 NW2d 619 (1947). 9 See Chicago, Detroit, etc v Jacobs, 225 Mich 677; 196 NW 621 (1924); Michigan Air Line Ry v Barnes, 44 Mich 222; 6 NW 651 (1880); Toledo, etc R Co v Dunlap, 47 Mich 456; 11 NW 271 (1882); Detroit, etc R Co v. [read post]
