Search for: "Lord v. State" Results 261 - 280 of 4,031
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Feb 2019, 4:47 pm by INFORRM
In the case of R (P, G and W) and Anor v Secretary of State for the Home Department and Anor [2019] UKSC 3 the Supreme Court upheld challenges to the legal regimes for disclosing criminal records in England and Wales, and Northern Ireland, finding them to be incompatible with Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights (“ECHR”). [read post]
3 Nov 2016, 3:21 am by Aimee Denholm
The Court considered the sovereignty of Parliament to be critical, and stated the Crown is not entitled to change domestic law through exercise of its prerogative powers. [read post]
29 Jul 2019, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Patel v Secretary of State for the Home Department; Secretary of State for the Home Department v Shah, heard 7 May 2019. [read post]
16 Feb 2022, 4:08 pm by INFORRM
The Supreme Court yesterday handed down judgment in ZXC v Bloomberg LP [2022] UKSC 5. [read post]
5 Jun 2012, 1:59 am
In Jones v Saudi Arabia the House of Lords concluded that the legal test for establishing the requisite connection between the impugned acts of the foreign state official and the foreign state as a corporate entity should be supplied by the rules of attribution in the law of state responsibility. [read post]
17 May 2011, 10:55 pm by Isabel McArdle
R (on the application of Evans) v The Lord Chancellor and Secretary of State for Justice [2011] EWHC 1146 (Admin) - Read judgment The High Court has found that the Ministry of Justice, when making a decision to cease the state’s funding of judicial review challenges on purely public interest grounds (apart from one exception), took into account the fact that to do so would reduce the number of decisions being made which were not in the… [read post]
20 Mar 2011, 5:31 am by Blog Editorial
On Wednesday 23 and Thursday 24 March, Bloomsbury International Limited and others v Sea Fish Industry Authority and Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs will be heard by Lords Phillips and Walker, Lady Hale, Lords Mance and Collins. [read post]
” Supported by the interveners – Bail for Immigration Detainees and Medical Justice – O successfully argued that the authority of R (Francis) v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Bail for Immigration Detainees intervening) [2014] EWCA Civ 718 had been wrongly decided. [read post]
26 Nov 2018, 11:16 pm
Infringement of Claim 3 The  focus of the infringement ruling is Claim 3, stating  --“use of pregabalin for the preparation of a pharmaceutical composition for treating neuropathic pain”.The claim in question is a purpose-limited process claim. [read post]
24 May 2011, 8:40 am by Cathyrn Hopkins, Olswang LLP
On 9 March 2011, the Supreme Court handed down its judgment in the joint appeal of Sienkiewicz v Grief (UK) Ltd; Knowsley MBC v Willmore [2011] UKSC 10. [read post]
25 Nov 2015, 2:16 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
In giving the lead judgment Lord Neuberger referred to the test founded in Janoweic v Russia (2013) 58 EHRR 792 for establishing when a case can be brought under the art 2 investigation duty if the deaths in question occurred prior to when the state in question signed up to the Convention or when it first gave the right to petition. [read post]
8 May 2008, 1:20 am
Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) Kempster, R v [2008] EWCA Crim 975 (07 May 2008) Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Seele Austria GmbH & Co KG v Tokio Marine Europe Insurance Ltd [2008] EWCA Civ 441 (07 May 2008) Secretary of State for the Home Department v Lord Alton of Liverpool & Ors [2008] EWCA Civ 443 (07 May 2008) Murray v Big Pictures (UK) Ltd [2008] EWCA Civ 446 (07 May 2008) Arnup v MW White Ltd. [2008] EWCA… [read post]
12 Mar 2021, 4:48 pm by INFORRM
Referring to the use of the power to order publications of a summary of court judgments in s.12 of the Defamation Act 2013, and comments made on this by Mr Justice Nicklin in a 2018 case, Lord Justice Warby states [55]: ….Counsel [Mr Speck] went so far as to suggest in writing that in this case this remedy is ‘intended more as a species of punishment and retribution rather than a necessary and proportionate measure in the interests of the claimant or the public’.… [read post]
24 Apr 2009, 1:48 pm by Aditya
State of Kerala quoted Lord Reid to say, “.. there was a time when it was almost indecent to suggest that judges make law- they only declare it. [read post]
24 Apr 2009, 1:48 pm by Aditya
State of Kerala quoted Lord Reid to say, “.. there was a time when it was almost indecent to suggest that judges make law- they only declare it. [read post]
5 Dec 2016, 2:30 am by Blog Editorial
He referenced the case of R v Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs ex parte Rees-Mogg discussed earlier today to support his submission on behalf of the government that when Parliament wants to exercise control over the prerogative power then it has done so expressly. 16.21: In response to a query from Lord Mance about the relevance of the legislation after the ECA 1972, James Eadie QC submits that as Article 50 was not in existence until… [read post]
27 Jul 2016, 2:28 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Lord Wilson have the leading judgment, with which Lady Hale, Lord Kerr, Lord Reed and Lord Toulson agree. [read post]
7 Nov 2011, 9:39 am by Laura Sandwell, Matrix
On Wednesday 9 October Deenish Benjamin and Deochan Ganga v The State of Trinidad and Tobago will be heard by Dame Heather Hallett and Lords Phillips, Kerr, Clarke and Wilson. [read post]