Search for: "M/V Lord"
Results 261 - 280
of 914
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Oct 2011, 5:47 am
The correct approach, he said, was that used by Lord Scarman in Reg. v. [read post]
24 Jul 2012, 5:17 pm
He based this finding on the words of Lord Osborne in H M Advocate v William Frederick Ian Beggs (No2) (2002 S.L.T. 139). [read post]
19 Feb 2020, 1:51 pm
It involves either an interference with the legal rights of an owner or a person with exclusive possession of land, including an interest in land such as an easement or a profit à prendre, or interference with the amenity of the land, that is to say the right to use and enjoy it, which is an inherent facet of a right of exclusive possession: Hunter v Canary Wharf Ltd (1997) AC 655 687G–688E (Lord Goff citing FH Newark, “The Boundaries of Nuisance” 65… [read post]
19 Feb 2020, 1:51 pm
It involves either an interference with the legal rights of an owner or a person with exclusive possession of land, including an interest in land such as an easement or a profit à prendre, or interference with the amenity of the land, that is to say the right to use and enjoy it, which is an inherent facet of a right of exclusive possession: Hunter v Canary Wharf Ltd (1997) AC 655 687G–688E (Lord Goff citing FH Newark, “The Boundaries of Nuisance” 65… [read post]
11 May 2023, 2:21 am
On 4 May 2023, a mere two weeks after the conclusion of the hearing, the Court of Appeal handed down its decision in Sandoz and Teva v BMS. [read post]
19 Dec 2016, 6:04 am
I'm sure readers will have an opinion... [read post]
20 Oct 2019, 5:37 am
While his Unwired Planet v. [read post]
9 Feb 2010, 12:42 am
I’m not sure how much I like that logic. [read post]
17 Apr 2018, 8:17 am
**El conversatorio es libre de costo, pero los interesados deberán confirmar asistencia al correo electrónico: saludacupunturapr@gmail.com Este evento cuenta con el auspicio de el Colegio de Abogados y Abogadas de Puerto Rico, sus comisiones sobre los Derechos de la Personas de Mayor Edad y la comisión de Derechos de las Personas Víctimas de Delito y de la Escuela de Salud Pública del Recinto de Ciencias Médicas. [read post]
28 Oct 2018, 5:09 pm
His conduct has been widely criticised including by Lord Judge, former Lord Chief Justice. [read post]
24 Feb 2014, 4:00 am
Brownstein, Town of Greece v. [read post]
28 Jan 2019, 4:05 pm
Various Claimants v W M Morrison Supermarkets plc [2018] EWCA Civ 2339. [read post]
1 Dec 2010, 9:59 pm
In DPP v Collins [2006] 1 WLR 2223 Lord Bingham said: Section 127(1)(a) does of course interfere with a person’s right to freedom of expression. [read post]
3 Dec 2010, 4:56 pm
In DPP v Collins [2006] 1 WLR 2223 Lord Bingham said: Section 127(1)(a) does of course interfere with a person’s right to freedom of expression. [read post]
28 Mar 2021, 1:21 pm
This was the approach taken by Linden J in R (on the application of M) v London Borough of Newham [2020] EWHC 327 (Admin) (our note). [read post]
29 Jan 2010, 5:38 am
On the inadequate reasons point, it was held that there is no particular form for the giving of reasons "… and having regard to the knowledge that [Ms Osei] and her solicitors could be taken to have had it was clear that sufficient reasons had been given for the agency's decisions" (applying R(M) v Hackney LBC [2009] EWHC 2255 - links to our note, see [35] of the judgment). [read post]
22 Jul 2010, 4:06 am
The well-known and much used defence arises from the 1999 case of Reynolds v Times Newspapers in which the House of Lords (now the Supreme Court) extended the defence of qualified privilege to cover the media. [read post]
29 Jan 2010, 5:38 am
On the inadequate reasons point, it was held that there is no particular form for the giving of reasons "… and having regard to the knowledge that [Ms Osei] and her solicitors could be taken to have had it was clear that sufficient reasons had been given for the agency's decisions" (applying R(M) v Hackney LBC [2009] EWHC 2255 - links to our note, see [35] of the judgment). [read post]
14 Dec 2008, 9:56 am
Earl Cadogan and other v Pitts and another; Earl Cadogan and another v Sportelli and another [2008] UKHL 71 Enfranchisement is the process whereby leaseholders can force their freeholder to sell them the freehold of the property. [read post]
10 May 2024, 6:00 am
Lord, Williston on Contracts § 56:92 [4th ed, May 2023 update]). [read post]
