Search for: "MATTER OF B T B" Results 261 - 280 of 20,007
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Jun 2020, 1:47 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
”  But “at least some of the purposes of Rule 9(b) are clearly implicated in the false advertising context,” such as protecting a defendant from unwarranted damage to its reputation (even though intent isn’t required, as it is not for trademark infringement). [read post]
13 Mar 2007, 2:32 pm
The A&B associates in Atlanta are outraged. [read post]
13 Mar 2007, 2:32 pm
The A&B associates in Atlanta are outraged. [read post]
17 Jun 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
(b) Decision T 893/90 concerns the use of a composition for controlling bleeding in non-hemophilic mammals as compared to the use of the same composition for controlling bleeding in hemophilic subjects. [read post]
6 Sep 2011, 4:12 am by Maxwell Kennerly
Recall how, just five years earlier even many doctors didn’t understand the dangers of Group B strep, how to prevent it, or how to treat it. [read post]
9 Dec 2014, 8:06 am by Ron Coleman
Supreme Court heard oral argument last week in a much anticipated trademark matter, B&B Hardware Inc. v. [read post]
9 Jun 2015, 9:07 am by Mack Sperling
"  That lack of reference to the quality of the dismissal didn't make a difference, because Rule 41(b) says that "all dismissals, including those under Rule 12(b)(6) operate as an adjudication upon the merits unless the trial court specifies that the dismissal is without prejudice. [read post]
26 Feb 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
Specifically, under the PCT this is a formal deficiency under Article 14(1)(a)(v) in combination with Rule 11.13(a), which can be remedied upon invitation under Article 14(1)(b). [read post]
1 Feb 2022, 12:32 am by Roel van Woudenberg
An assignment of the priority rights of the inventors Wang and Zhong to the appellant or the University of Western Ontario had not taken place prior to the filing of the PCT application.The subject-matter of claim 1 (thus) lacked novelty over the disclosure in documents D20 and D21.Considering document D21 as representing the closest prior art, the subject-matter of claim 1 of auxiliary request 1 lacked an inventive step.The subject-matter of claim 1 of auxiliary request 2… [read post]
11 Nov 2020, 2:19 am
Vision Sys., Inc., 57 USPQ2d 1211, 1218 (TTAB 2000)TMEP § 1204.04(b), entitled "Deletion of § 2(b) Matter," states that a flag design may be deleted "if the flag design is spatially separated from other matter in the mark or is used as a background for other words or designs. [read post]
14 Mar 2019, 12:04 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
These were admissible hearsay, going to state of mind and not the truth of the matter asserted. [read post]
12 Oct 2009, 3:31 pm by Ashley Brandt
If it does, then its possible that Section 5(b)(iii) would allow for a different outcome than Weather-Tite (an owner paying the sub's fee twice where the fee didn't get to the sub the first time), which did not implicate 5(b)(iii) or owner-occupied single-family residences. [read post]
12 Feb 2021, 3:32 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Also, perhaps capacity is in tension with ©--the cultural association b/t creativity and madness is a long one. [read post]
30 Oct 2020, 6:24 am by Rebecca Tushnet
With this amount of conflicting evidence as to the similarity of the two designs, it was error for the District Court to conclude that, as a matter of law, J-B Weld had not shown that the two products’ trade dress designs were similar. [read post]
11 Apr 2017, 6:19 am by Sander van Rijnswou
Insufficiency of disclosure (Article 100(b) EPC)4.1 The Appellant objected that the subject-matter of claim 1 could not be carried out over the whole range claimed. [read post]
17 Nov 2014, 1:52 pm by Lucy Reed
And Re B and Re B-S don’t actually set out new law, or anything we haven’t been told before. [read post]
25 Apr 2012, 3:32 pm by Kent Scheidegger
  Does that mean Adams hasn't filed a certiorari petition yet but only a stay request? [read post]