Search for: "MATTER OF J C B" Results 261 - 280 of 3,043
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Dec 2022, 7:08 am
 Pix Credit hereWhile interest in this case, HKSAR v Lai Man Ling [2022] 4 HKC 410, [2022] HKDC 355, reported in September 2022, may be diminishing, its relevance requires sustained examination. [read post]
26 Nov 2022, 6:52 am by Russell Knight
“[J]urisdiction over petitions for modification is only proper pursuant to sections 201 and 611 of the Family Support Act” In re Marriage of Vailas, 406 Ill. [read post]
25 Nov 2022, 6:30 am by Elin Hofverberg
Born on November 25, 1824, in Jönköping, Sweden, Amelia was orphaned at a young age and worked as a domestic maid before marrying a local tailor, Anders Eriksson. [read post]
23 Nov 2022, 2:50 am by Emma Kent
The husband raised conduct concerning alleged matters during the marriage. [read post]
20 Nov 2022, 11:38 am by Giles Peaker
Her household consisted of her three children and four of her sister’s children, A, her youngest child, is 6 months old; R is 4; Y is 7; B is 9; H is 12; J is 12; and S is 16. [read post]
20 Nov 2022, 9:55 am by David Kopel
Michigan J. of Law Reform 175 (2013) (with Clayton Cramer and Joseph Olson). [read post]
18 Nov 2022, 8:01 pm by Josh Blackman
It is painfully clear that Garland appointed Smith for one reason, and one reason alone: "prosecuting a particular individual" named Donald J. [read post]
8 Nov 2022, 12:33 pm by Jonathan H. Adler
The three judges each wrote their own opinions, and broke down this way: GRIFFIN, J., announced the judgment of the court and delivered the opinion of the court with respect to the Introduction and Parts II, III.G., and IV, and delivered an opinion with respect to Parts I, III, III.A, B, C, D, E, and F. [read post]
4 Nov 2022, 1:36 am by Roel van Woudenberg
  The examining division equated the term "embodiment" with subject-matter that has to fall "within the scope of the invention as defined by the claims", and concluded that the description so adapted was not in conformity with the independent claims, contrary to Rule 42(1)(c) EPC, because the term "embodiment" was used in parts of the description that describe subject-matter that was not part of the subject-matter of these… [read post]
1 Nov 2022, 10:23 am by David Kopel
[Professors Miller and Tucker miss the mark, while Saul Cornell disdains accuracy] An article by Duke law professor Darrell A.H. [read post]