Search for: "MATTER OF J W" Results 261 - 280 of 2,608
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Sep 2022, 2:58 am
Foster, APC, Serial No. 87981611 (September 19, 2022) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge Thomas W. [read post]
15 Sep 2022, 1:24 pm by admin
Cheng does not explain why, under his proposed “consensus rule,” subject matter experts are needed at all. [read post]
13 Sep 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
”  One may wonder whether Hamilton was sincere, but it really doesn’t matter. [read post]
9 Sep 2022, 10:52 am by Eugene Volokh
I then turn to subject matter jurisdiction and the personal jurisdiction arguments raised by certain Defendants. [read post]
8 Sep 2022, 5:35 am by Jack Goldsmith
A few states, for instance—including New York, where Fox is headquartered—require a showing of "actual malice" for all statements of public concern, including statements about private figures.[2] Most other states allow recovery of proven compensatory damages for libel based on a showing of mere negligence.[3] Presumably Fox would want to avoid even negligent mistakes, just as a matter of editorial policy. [read post]
7 Sep 2022, 5:23 am by Eugene Volokh
[Jack Goldsmith and I will have this article out in the Texas Law Review early next year, and I'm serializing it here. [read post]
31 Aug 2022, 7:46 am by Matthias Weller
 74-80 Çaliskan, Yusuf; Çaliskan, Zeynep “2 Temmuz 2019 Tarihli Yabanci Mahkeme Kararlarinin Taninmasi ve Tenfizine Iliskin Lahey Anlasmasinin Degerlendirilmesi”, Public and Private International Law Bulletin 40 (2020), pp 231-245 (available here) (An Evaluation of 2 July 2019 Hague Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Judgments in Civil or Commercial Matters) Cardoso, Connor J. [read post]
25 Aug 2022, 4:54 pm by Eugene Volokh
{Indeed, we have explained that "[w]e may decide a question not addressed by the District Court when the record has been sufficiently developed for us to resolve the legal issue. [read post]
21 Aug 2022, 5:06 am by Bernard Bell
”  The rule applied “even where the program matter is furnished without charge or at a nominal charge as an inducement to the broadcast of the program. [read post]
2 Aug 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
For that matter, Justices Breyer, Kagan, and Sotomayor, as well as Justice Brown Jackson (while a federal judge), use those canons with increasing frequency in statutory interpretation cases as well.[17]Recognizing that fact, Justice Elena Kagan and a leading nontextualist scholar of statutory interpretation, Professor William Eskridge, have quipped, “[w]e’re all textualists now” (well, before walking that statement back in dissent to this past Term’s… [read post]