Search for: "MATTER OF JAMES v. State"
Results 261 - 280
of 4,083
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 May 2023, 7:46 am
Instead, the court says that any actual confusion evidenced by the call logs was de minimis as a matter of law. [read post]
21 May 2023, 9:00 pm
The President has to keep the pressure on Republicans to relent, which means that he has to keep everyone in suspense about what he will do if (or as seems increasingly likely when) they refuse to budge.The Strategy Now: Brace for Blowback No Matter What Biden DoesOr maybe not. [read post]
19 May 2023, 4:29 pm
State v. [read post]
18 May 2023, 5:14 am
” In United States v. [read post]
15 May 2023, 10:57 am
United States and Jackson v. [read post]
15 May 2023, 1:53 am
India Kerala has become the first state in India to distribute drone surveillance systems to all of its policing districts. [read post]
14 May 2023, 9:00 pm
Why does that matter? [read post]
2 May 2023, 5:00 am
(Since that last claim wasn’t “cognizable as a matter of law,” the AD2 declined to revive it.)I guess they couldn’t have stated it any better.# # #DECISIONK.W. v State of New York# # #COMMENTARY: We believe it's shameful, and hypocritical, that the Attorney General's Office is taking a hard-line position in these cases.In a statement issued on January 28, 2019, in response to the passage of the Child Victims Act, New York… [read post]
2 May 2023, 12:30 am
John the Evangelist Killingworth, supra, in which the Chancellor stated: “[53]. [read post]
1 May 2023, 8:57 am
That was the lesson James Madison, the principal author of the First Amendment, drew from the Sedition Act controversy. [read post]
26 Apr 2023, 2:39 pm
(He has a bad habit of ignoring unhelpful precedent; See U.S. v. [read post]
26 Apr 2023, 5:01 am
" … The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit provides [under the James v. [read post]
22 Apr 2023, 6:00 am
Ruderman v New York State Ins. [read post]
22 Apr 2023, 6:00 am
Ruderman v New York State Ins. [read post]
18 Apr 2023, 5:48 am
" But, in Doe v. [read post]
18 Apr 2023, 5:16 am
He points to the Supreme Court’s 2020 decision in Trump v. [read post]
17 Apr 2023, 1:56 pm
In each instance, she found that the alleged misrepresentations or omissions were insufficient to state a claim. [read post]
16 Apr 2023, 10:29 am
He had some pretty strong words about the decision of his predecessor Sir James Munby in a case called A v. [read post]
14 Apr 2023, 4:52 am
Co. v Thirsty Moose, Inc., 19 AD3d 721, 722 [3d Dept 2005]; see Saint James’ Episcopal Church v F.O.C.U.S. [read post]
13 Apr 2023, 7:11 am
" United States v. [read post]
