Search for: "MATTER OF R T"
Results 261 - 280
of 53,758
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 May 2013, 5:01 pm
More importantly, however, the principle relied on in decision R 21/11, namely that the replacement of members of the BoA should not be ordered without good reason, is not merely a matter of procedural economy. [read post]
4 Nov 2020, 10:14 am
De jure universal suffrage doesn't matter if de facto voter disenfranchisement happens in courtrooms. [read post]
1 Nov 2008, 12:38 pm
It doesn't matter whether you call copyright infringement stealing or something entirely different, the point is that copyright infringement is wrong. [read post]
22 Apr 2010, 7:00 am
Don't miss this issue. [read post]
19 Oct 2015, 12:00 am
Does she talk as if she has experience with this type of matter? [read post]
22 Feb 2012, 5:01 pm
In accordance with R 115(2), the proceedings continued without him. [read post]
20 Aug 2014, 11:47 pm
Antitrust matters to me. [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 9:27 am
"And the addictive stuff we love doesn’t have to be completely substanceless. [read post]
16 Jun 2013, 5:01 pm
The board thus concluded that Mr S. was duly authorised to represent the [opponent] in addition to Mr M.The [patent proprietor] also referred to the communication on matters concerning representation before the EPO (OJ EPO 4/1978, 281) cited on the reverse side of EPO Form 1003. [read post]
4 Apr 2022, 1:05 am
According to the Board of Appeal, there is long-established case law interpreting Art. 84 EPC as requiring the entirety of the description to be consistent with the allowable claims (T 0977/94, r. 6.1; T 0300/04, r. 5; T 1808/06, r. 2). [read post]
3 Oct 2011, 5:01 pm
This amendment is considered by the [patent proprietor] to represent a mere correction under R 139 of the wording of claim 1 as granted. [4] R 139 (former R 88 EPC 1973) provides in its second sentence that a correction of errors in documents filed with the EPO that concerns the description, claims or drawings can only be allowed if the correction is obvious in the sense that it is immediately evident that nothing else would have been intended than what is offered as… [read post]
10 Aug 2010, 3:01 pm
If you read the whole story, you will find interesting things on T 352/04 and on the requirements of R 80. [read post]
19 Oct 2007, 7:42 pm
I DON'T THINK THE ACTIVE VOICE IS APPROPRIATE HERE: "No matter what, Democrats are going to make a ton of money for a charity off their political vitriol. [read post]
11 Jul 2016, 6:54 am
In "After Dallas, the Future of Black Lives Matter," in The New Yorker, Jelani Cobb interviewing Alicia Garza, the co-founder of Black Lives Matter, asks about guns: "Does Black Lives Matter have a position on that? [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 5:01 pm
Independent claims in the same category; R 29(2) EPC 1973[4.3] As set out in the appealed decision, the subject-matter claimed in the independent method claims 1 and 10, as well as the subject-matter claimed in the independent apparatus claims 3 and 12, does not involve any of the exceptions (a), (b) or (c) mentioned under R 29(2) EPC 1973. [read post]
27 Jan 2012, 10:53 am
As before, I don't see that case as being made -- that she participated as counselor or adviser in that matter. [read post]
9 Feb 2015, 12:40 pm
I'm not saying that Brian Williams didn't lie, I'm saying it doesn't matter. [read post]
1 Nov 2011, 6:01 pm
On January 7, 2005, the Examining Division (ED) decided to refuse the European application under consideration because it considered that the subject-matter of claim 1 lacked an inventive step. [read post]
13 Feb 2013, 5:01 pm
Instead he requested that a decision under R 111(2) be issued on the basis of the submissions filed so far. [read post]
22 Jul 2012, 5:01 pm
The search division had issued a declaration under R 45 EPC 1973 on the grounds that the claims related to subject-matter excluded from patentability and commonplace implementation features. [read post]
