Search for: "MATTER OF T J B"
Results 261 - 280
of 3,058
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Mar 2011, 4:01 pm
As an auxiliary measure, it was requested that the following question be referred to the Enlarged Board of Appeal (EBA): a) If an authorisation is filed by facsimile, does the facsimile represent a copy in accordance with the Decision of the President [of the EPO dated 12 July 2007 on the filing of authorisations (OJ Special Edition 3/2007, L1, page 128)];b) If yes, is the EPO obliged in accordance with the Decision to inform the representative that an authorisation has not been… [read post]
18 Oct 2011, 4:22 pm
B. [read post]
22 Jul 2020, 3:38 pm
But, rightly or wrongly, Roger B. [read post]
3 Apr 2014, 8:25 pm
T is for Tip Income. [read post]
15 Feb 2016, 6:09 am
But he does say this:Minority voters are a different matter. [read post]
27 Oct 2009, 7:28 pm
I was, of course, aware that those views existed but it had seemed to me that it was clear that that wasn't what J Street is there to advocate for. [read post]
15 Aug 2017, 9:30 pm
For an answer to this question, it is instructive to look to a 2011 speech by then-FTC Commissioner J. [read post]
18 Jul 2021, 4:05 pm
That meant it was a matter of law for the court to decide, the judge said. [read post]
5 Nov 2021, 5:48 am
M W G J LLC, 2021 WL 4975102, at *2 (N.D. [read post]
5 Nov 2008, 4:48 pm
Well, it's déjà vu in spades. [read post]
20 Sep 2018, 7:17 am
The taking into account of this argument necessarily leads to the consideration of the applicant's argumentation concerning the inventive step of the subject-matter of claim 1. [read post]
15 Sep 2009, 3:30 am
It is, therefore, something of a surprise to see Stadlen J dealing with… a blanket policy. [read post]
28 Jul 2014, 9:16 am
Even if McCarthy’s statement means that a trade dress with more elements is generally weaker than a trademark with fewer elements, that didn’t matter on the facts of this case. [read post]
31 Mar 2013, 5:01 pm
However, as stated in T 905/90 [10], this Article was designed to prevent a loss of rights “where an inadvertent error of some kind had led to a slight, small insignificant or trifling underpayment of an amount due in respect of the relevant proceedings. [read post]
4 Oct 2010, 3:45 pm
Christopher J. [read post]
12 Oct 2017, 12:00 am
O’Brien 105,000 154,999 0 27,397 287,396 Marissa T. [read post]
9 Jul 2008, 12:36 am
Hazel J. [read post]
15 Jul 2014, 5:12 am
July 10, 2014) (J. [read post]
15 Jun 2014, 4:42 pm
Guest Post by Professor Lynda J. [read post]
7 Dec 2020, 12:39 am
(b) Where the original intention is not immediately apparent, the requester bears the burden of proof, which must be a heavy one (J 8/80, loc.cit., Reasons No. 6). [read post]
