Search for: "MGN"
Results 261 - 280
of 542
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Jun 2019, 4:34 pm
On 13 June 2019 was a hearing before Norris J in the case of Winstone v MGN. [read post]
30 Apr 2021, 7:52 am
The Court of Appeal wrongly interpreted and relied on the case of Gulati v MGN, which found that “loss of control” damages were available for persistent phone-hacking. [read post]
8 Mar 2015, 5:09 pm
Last Week in the Courts The Mirror Group phone hacking trial, Various Claimants v MGN, began before Mann J on 2 March 2015 and continued through to 6 March 2015. [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 1:07 am
Last Week in the Courts As mentioned above, Fancourt J continued to hear the trial of Various Claimants v MGN. [read post]
5 Apr 2017, 12:26 am
In this case the Court seems to have taken a less stringent approach than it did in previous cases such as Cooke & Midland Hart v MGN [2014] EWHC 2831 (QB), in which it was held that serious harm could only be inferred in the most extreme of circumstances. [read post]
13 Mar 2017, 2:00 am
Times Newspaper Ltd v Flood; Miller v Associated Newspapers Ltd; Frost & Ors v MGN Ltd, heard 24-26 January 2017. [read post]
21 Nov 2010, 6:01 am
In John v MGN Ltd [1997] QB 586, [1995] EWCA Civ 23 (12 December 1995) Lord Bingham MR said that such juries “were in the position of sheep loosed on an unfenced common, with no shepherd”. [read post]
23 Mar 2023, 5:51 pm
General damages Whilst no case was identified to assist the Judge directly with the assessment of general damages, the Judge considered a number of authorities including MGN Limited v Representative Claimants [2015] EWCA Civ 1291, Reid v Price [2020] EWHC 594 (QB), Re TP (Kemp & Kemp, Vol 3 C2-002), ABC and WH v Willock [2015] EWHC 2687 (QB) and Bull v Desporte [2019] EWHC 1650 (QB) from which it is possible to draw the following guidance: The appropriate compensation for damages in… [read post]
14 Feb 2011, 4:05 pm
In relation to the recent decision in MGN v United Kingdom, the Bar Council response says this “the importance of that case ought not to be overstated. [read post]
4 Jan 2015, 4:04 pm
On the basis of the approach taken by Bean J in Cooke v MGN ([2014] EWHC 2831 (QB)) it is difficult to see how this evidence could, of itself, satisfy the “seriousness” threshold in section 1. [read post]
30 Mar 2011, 6:06 am
161/10 eDate Advertising GmbH v X and Olivier Martinez et Robert Martinez v Société MGN Limited. [read post]
15 Jan 2022, 4:05 pm
MGN Limited v. [read post]
9 Oct 2020, 6:45 am
In Price v MGN Ltd [2019] 1 WLR 1464 Warby J indicated that “experience suggests that in the general run of cases costs of the order of £20,000 to £25,000 per side are towards the top end of the range, and costs in excess of £30,000 for one side would be hard to justify” [34]. [read post]
4 Jul 2016, 4:07 pm
I agree – if Kennedy and Sullivan are anything to go by, the levels are not very high (especially by comparison with damages for defamation; see Mosley v News Group Newspapers [2008] EWHC 1777 (QB) (24 July 2008) [212] (Eady J); though note also Representative Claimants v MGN Ltd [2016] 2 WLR 1217, [2015] EWCA Civ 1291 (17 December 2015)). [read post]
10 May 2010, 5:06 pm
However, the House of Lords has made it clear that there is no tort of invasion of privacy ( see Wainwright v Home Office [2004] 2 AC 406, Campbell v MGN [2004] 2AC 457, and the Court of Appeal in McKennitt v Ash) . [read post]
29 May 2010, 4:18 am
In the UK judgment in Campbell v MGN – the seminal case that effectively launched privacy actions in the UK – the publishers at Mirror Group Newspapers may ultimately have gone down in the House of Lords on a 3:2 majority, but there was no question that they could possibly ‘go down’ in the criminal sense. [read post]
6 Feb 2017, 1:00 am
Times Newspaper Ltd v Flood; Miller v Associated Newspapers Ltd; Frost & Ors v MGN Ltd, heard 24-26 January 2017 Isle of Wight Council v Platt, heard 31 January 2017 Hartley & Ors v King Edward VI College, heard 1 February 2017 IPCO (Nigeria) Ltd v Nigeria National Petroleum Corp, heard 2 February 2017 [read post]
6 Mar 2017, 1:00 am
Times Newspaper Ltd v Flood; Miller v Associated Newspapers Ltd; Frost & Ors v MGN Ltd, heard 24-26 January 2017. [read post]
16 Mar 2015, 10:00 am
The Strasbourg Court criticised recoverable success fees in MGN v UK (2011) 53 EHRR 5 and disagreed with the view of the Supreme Court in an earlier hearing of the matter. [read post]
3 May 2015, 4:09 pm
Judgments The following reserved judgment in media law cases are outstanding: OPO v MLA, heard 19 and 20 January 2015 (UK Supreme Court) Murray v Associated Newspapers, heard 21 January 2015 (Longmore, Ryder and Sharp LJJ) Various Claimants v MGN, heard 9-13, 18, 24-25 March 2015 (Mann J). [read post]
