Search for: "MGN"
Results 261 - 280
of 542
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Nov 2023, 4:57 pm
Judgment Damages In considering damages, Master Bell dealt with the purpose of damages in a defamation action as outlined in John v MGN Limited [1997] QB 586. [read post]
4 Feb 2024, 4:40 pm
Last Week in the Courts On 29 January 2024, the consequentials hearing was heard following the judgment of The Duke of Sussex & Ors v MGN Ltd [2023] EWHC 3217 (Ch), handed down on 15 December 2023. [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 1:24 am
On the same day Bean J heard the “offer of amends” case of KC v MGN Ltd – a claim by the natural father of “Baby P” wrongly accused in The People of being a sex offender convicted of raping a 14-year-old girl. [read post]
8 Mar 2015, 5:09 pm
Last Week in the Courts The Mirror Group phone hacking trial, Various Claimants v MGN, began before Mann J on 2 March 2015 and continued through to 6 March 2015. [read post]
27 Feb 2012, 8:00 am
In this regard, the Grand Chamber enunciated its standard of review: where the domestic courts have engaged in the appropriate balancing exercise consistent with Article 10 principles, the European Court will require “strong reasons” to substitute its views for those of the domestic courts (citing MGN Limited v. the United Kingdom and Palomo Sánchez v. [read post]
11 Dec 2015, 12:00 pm
The decision in relation to the Mirror Group came as a surprise to many observers as the company had made wide ranging admissions of phone hacking in a civil trial in March 2015 (see Gulati v MGN Limited [2015] EWHC 1482 (Ch)). [read post]
3 Apr 2017, 1:00 am
Times Newspaper Ltd v Flood; Miller v Associated Newspapers Ltd; Frost & Ors v MGN Ltd, heard 24-26 January 2017. [read post]
17 Jul 2011, 5:20 pm
Ferdinand v MGN, heard 4 to 6 July 2011 (Nicol J) Thornton v Telegraph Media Group, heard 4 to 6 and 8 July 2011 (Tugendhat J) Robins & anr v Kordowski, heard on 14 July 2011 (Tugendhat J) [read post]
23 Mar 2023, 5:51 pm
General damages Whilst no case was identified to assist the Judge directly with the assessment of general damages, the Judge considered a number of authorities including MGN Limited v Representative Claimants [2015] EWCA Civ 1291, Reid v Price [2020] EWHC 594 (QB), Re TP (Kemp & Kemp, Vol 3 C2-002), ABC and WH v Willock [2015] EWHC 2687 (QB) and Bull v Desporte [2019] EWHC 1650 (QB) from which it is possible to draw the following guidance: The appropriate compensation for damages in… [read post]
25 Jan 2013, 4:50 am
Unlike, say, Campbell v MGN Ltd [2004] AC 457, [2004] UKHL 22 (6 May 2004), this is not a case of Cowen on intensely private and personal time, seeking private help for very personal demons. [read post]
15 Jan 2022, 4:05 pm
MGN Limited v. [read post]
10 May 2010, 5:06 pm
However, the House of Lords has made it clear that there is no tort of invasion of privacy ( see Wainwright v Home Office [2004] 2 AC 406, Campbell v MGN [2004] 2AC 457, and the Court of Appeal in McKennitt v Ash) . [read post]
14 Apr 2018, 4:18 pm
It sounds true that many claimants would struggle to prove factual harm to reputation at trial, but of the 50-odd cases which have mentioned section 1, I think only three resulted in the defendant winning at trial on “serious harm” (Cooke v MGN [2015] 1 WLR 895; Sobrinho v Impresa Publishing [2016] EMLR 12; Umeyor v Ibe [2016] EWHC 862 (QB). [read post]
4 Jul 2016, 4:07 pm
I agree – if Kennedy and Sullivan are anything to go by, the levels are not very high (especially by comparison with damages for defamation; see Mosley v News Group Newspapers [2008] EWHC 1777 (QB) (24 July 2008) [212] (Eady J); though note also Representative Claimants v MGN Ltd [2016] 2 WLR 1217, [2015] EWCA Civ 1291 (17 December 2015)). [read post]
5 Sep 2011, 12:45 am
Reserved Judgments The following reserved judgments after public hearings remain outstanding: Ferdinand v MGN, heard 4 to 6 July 2011 (Nicol J) WXY v Gewanter, heard 11-15, 18-19 July 2011 (Slade J) Commissioner of Police v Times Newspapers, heard 18-20 & 22 July 2011 (Tugendhat J) Morrison v Buckinghamshire CC, heard 20 to 21 July (HHJ Parkes QC) Share this:PrintEmailTwitterFacebookLike this:Be the first to like this post. [read post]
21 Jan 2019, 4:43 pm
– Brian Cathcart Case Law: Gulati v MGN Ltd, A landmark decision on the quantum of privacy damages – Hugh Tomlinson QC and Sara Mansoori Case Law: “Spiller v Joseph – the New Defence of Honest Comment” – Catherine Rhind Case Law: Iqbal v Dean Manson, harassment by letter – Edward Craven Defamation Act 2013: The public interest defence and digital communications – Jacob Rowbottom Case Law: Růžový Panter, OS v Czech Republic:… [read post]
19 Jul 2018, 4:43 pm
Three years ago, he decided the landmark breach of privacy/damages case of Gulati and others v Mirror Group Newspapers after another 12-day hearing where he delivered a comprehensive 205-page judgment awarding a total of £1,237,000 in damages to eight representative celebrities whose privacy had been invaded by MGN’s admitted hacking of their personal data. [read post]
29 May 2010, 4:18 am
In the UK judgment in Campbell v MGN – the seminal case that effectively launched privacy actions in the UK – the publishers at Mirror Group Newspapers may ultimately have gone down in the House of Lords on a 3:2 majority, but there was no question that they could possibly ‘go down’ in the criminal sense. [read post]
30 Mar 2011, 6:06 am
161/10 eDate Advertising GmbH v X and Olivier Martinez et Robert Martinez v Société MGN Limited. [read post]
13 Jun 2011, 12:25 am
MGN LIMITED v. [read post]
