Search for: "MICHEL V. STATE"
Results 261 - 280
of 1,815
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Oct 2021, 1:05 pm
She believes King Louis V is her father and Donald Trump, Michelle Obama, and Queen Elizabeth communicate with her through satellites. [read post]
5 Oct 2021, 8:21 am
Professor of Law & Director of Clinical Legal Education, UC Davis School of Law--Robert Cover as Critical Race Theorist Mark Graber, University System of Maryland Regents Professor, University of Maryland Carey School of Law & Sandford V. [read post]
4 Oct 2021, 1:52 pm
Michel and John T. [read post]
4 Oct 2021, 1:52 pm
Michel and John T. [read post]
23 Sep 2021, 4:39 pm
UN High Commissioner for Human Rights Michelle Bachelet has called for a moratorium on the sale and use of artificial intelligence (AI) systems that pose a serious risk to human rights until adequate safeguards are put in place. [read post]
16 Sep 2021, 7:06 am
STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA COUNTY COUNCIL FOR RICHLAND COUNTY ORDINANCE NO. [read post]
28 Aug 2021, 11:56 am
Davis won in State v. [read post]
25 Aug 2021, 2:07 pm
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, which issued a decision in Sackett v. [read post]
23 Aug 2021, 12:27 pm
In its recent decision in Carrone v. [read post]
23 Aug 2021, 12:27 pm
In its recent decision in Carrone v. [read post]
23 Aug 2021, 12:27 pm
In its recent decision in Carrone v. [read post]
11 Aug 2021, 5:41 am
Filed: April 30, 2021Opinion by: Judge Michele D. [read post]
30 Jul 2021, 8:21 am
Established in 1931, SGA has for 90 years successfully operated with a two-word mission statement: “Protect Songwriters,” and continues to do so throughout the United States and the world. [read post]
23 Jul 2021, 7:32 am
Huss v. [read post]
23 Jul 2021, 6:06 am
Silk, Sabastian V. [read post]
21 Jul 2021, 9:17 am
The Smith holding has been under pressure—in a Court decision in June called Fulton v. [read post]
13 Jul 2021, 10:58 am
In the United States (US), as for most developed countries,[6] trade policy and IP standards have consistently been linked, a pattern which can (at least partially) be traced back to extensive lobbying by senior management at US-based technology and pharmaceutical firms.[7] For example, since at least the 1980s, Pfizer Inc. has been involved in mobilizing other US firms and stakeholders to lobby US policymakers on the issue of international IP protection. [read post]
18 Jun 2021, 1:09 pm
Here, Stanford Law School health law experts Michelle Mello and David Studdert discuss California v. [read post]
12 Jun 2021, 1:29 pm
Kurup discussed the Supreme Court’s decision to hear United States v. [read post]
10 Jun 2021, 11:03 am
ICYMI: Yesterday on Lawfare Orin Kerr explained what the Supreme Court’s decision in Van Buren v. [read post]
