Search for: "MILLER v. CALIFORNIA" Results 261 - 280 of 1,666
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Jan 2008, 7:04 am
The new case was Miller-Jenkins v. [read post]
30 Nov 2015, 11:41 am by Arthur F. Coon
For nearly all that time, the firm also has written Miller & Starr, California Real Estate 4th, a 12-volume treatise on California real estate law. [read post]
22 Dec 2014, 11:44 am by Arthur F. Coon and Matthew C. Henderson
  For nearly all that time, the firm also has written Miller & Starr, California Real Estate 3d, a 12-volume treatise on California real estate law. [read post]
  For nearly all that time, the firm also has written Miller & Starr, California Real Estate 3d, a 12-volume treatise on California real estate law. [read post]
17 Jan 2008, 6:00 am
This morning at 9:30, the Court of Appeal for the Sixth Appellate District will hear oral argument in County of Santa Clara v. [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 1:40 pm by Ellen Marrus
The United States Supreme Court today continued with its line of cases favoring children in the decisions of Miller v. [read post]
16 Jun 2020, 9:01 pm by Sherry F. Colb
United States); or even in one’s enclosed but not fully covered “curtilage” when viewed from an airplane (California v. [read post]
21 Apr 2021, 9:02 am by Arthur F. Coon
  For nearly all that time, the firm also has written Miller & Starr, California Real Estate 3d, a 12-volume treatise on California real estate law. [read post]
28 Aug 2014, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
SB 1272 submits the following question (designated by the California Secretary of State as Proposition 49) to the California electorate for its input: Shall the Congress of the United States propose, and the California Legislature ratify, an amendment or amendments to the United States Constitution to overturn Citizens United v. [read post]
29 Jun 2014, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
Courts can revisit their prior rulings, higher courts can change the legal landscape against which lower courts make decisions (as the Supreme Court in fact did in the immigration regulation setting in 2012 in Arizona v. [read post]