Search for: "MINISTER v. STATE"
Results 261 - 280
of 3,985
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Mar 2023, 12:01 am
In 1944, the NAACP triumphed in Smith v. [read post]
9 Mar 2023, 11:35 am
Beyer’s article Estate Planning Ramifications of Obergefell v. [read post]
8 Mar 2023, 1:39 pm
A strong judiciary might well reinstate Roe v. [read post]
8 Mar 2023, 3:32 am
Last Thursday, March 2nd, the Supreme Court of India (SCI) pronounced its judgment in the case of Anoop Baranwal v. [read post]
7 Mar 2023, 4:00 am
In Upadhyay v. [read post]
6 Mar 2023, 3:16 am
On Thursday 9th March 2023 the Court will hear R (on the application of Toraane and another) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, on appeal from [2021] EWCA Civ 348. [read post]
5 Mar 2023, 6:45 am
In this regard, the Interim Report recommends that the WFL prohibit workplace discrimination in respect of the following characteristics: (i) age, (ii) nationality, (iii) sex, marital status, pregnancy status, caregiving responsibilities, (iv) race, religion, language, (v) disability and mental health conditions (the “Protected Characteristics”). [read post]
2 Mar 2023, 4:18 am
Blinken and Foreign Minister Sergey V. [read post]
27 Feb 2023, 9:47 am
United States On 21 February 2023, the Supreme Court heard arguments in the case of Gonzalez v. [read post]
27 Feb 2023, 2:17 am
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: (As of 03/03/23) The Law Debenture Trust Corporation plc v Ukraine (Represented by the Minister of Finance of Ukraine acting upon the instructions of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine) Nos. 2 and 3, heard 9-12 December 2019 East of England Ambulance Service NHS Trust v Flowers and Ors, heard 22 June 2021 Canada Square Operations Ltd v Potter, heard 14th June 2022 R (on the… [read post]
24 Feb 2023, 1:39 am
As stated in the first part, “[g]iven that the key concerns against the CAB was that if passed, it may end up before the ConCourt, it appears the Court’s decision in Blind SA v Minister for Trade, Industry and Competition & others may offer a foretaste of what could happen should the CAB end up before that court”. [read post]
23 Feb 2023, 8:45 pm
But the majority of MPs (from the ruling party, African National Congress (ANC) supported the Bill and the Bill was accordingly passed.This two-part post reviews the MPs’ opposition to the CAB vis-à-vis the decision of the ConCourt in Blind SA v Minister for Trade, Industry and Competition. [read post]
22 Feb 2023, 5:13 am
Despite widespread fears in the tech community about such a blow, the justices’ arguments in the case of Gonzalez v. [read post]
21 Feb 2023, 5:30 am
Here are our leading legal headlines for the week of February 21, 2023 from Wise Law on Twitter:Manitoba man imprisoned for decades to get appeal after likely miscarriage of justice, minister saysReasonable Expectation of Privacy in IP Addresses? [read post]
21 Feb 2023, 5:16 am
By 1993, the Supreme Court in Amitai v. [read post]
21 Feb 2023, 3:45 am
Google and Twitter v. [read post]
20 Feb 2023, 1:57 am
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: (As of 24/02/23) The Law Debenture Trust Corporation plc v Ukraine (Represented by the Minister of Finance of Ukraine acting upon the instructions of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine) Nos. 2 and 3, heard 9-12 December 2019 East of England Ambulance Service NHS Trust v Flowers and Ors, heard 22 June 2021 Canada Square Operations Ltd v Potter, heard 14th June 2022 R (on the… [read post]
19 Feb 2023, 5:21 pm
The chief minister denies the allegations. [read post]
15 Feb 2023, 6:18 am
In 1969, in Bergman v. [read post]
14 Feb 2023, 5:01 am
The latter role has no analogue in the United States, where the Supreme Court has original jurisdiction only over the smallest range of matters and serves almost exclusively as an appellate body. [read post]
